2.1 Evidence Café scenario

You will now watch a short animated video of some migration stakeholders discussing the planning of an Evidence Café.

Activity 2.1 Evidence Café scenario

Timing: Allow 15 minutes

As you watch Video 2.1 consider these ideas:

  • In Evidence Cafés it is important to try to understand where a participant is ‘coming from’ and how this shapes their views. What do you believe each character's job and status is and what are the goals that they seek to achieve?
  • A key issue in an Evidence Café is to overcome a natural desire to convince others of our opinions rather than listening to different viewpoints. How well do these stakeholders listen and comment on each other's opinions? Reflect on your own biases when listening to the evidence that each stakeholder gives while remaining neutral and not judging their opinions.
Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Show transcript|Hide transcript
Video 2.1 Evidence Café discussion
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Make notes in the text box below, which you will revisit in Unit 6 when we re-watch the video.

To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Discussion

In the video we heard a group of people talking about their perspectives on migration, which were not obviously connected – each one simply stated their issues and concerns. The discussion was in its early stages, but it was being facilitated by Sophie. The key to an Evidence Café is that the discussion between people is structured around a common focus and is facilitated by a dedicated person. In this discussion you will have seen that the stakeholders weren’t listening to each other and often were more focused on defending their own position, convincing others that they were right, or getting their opinions or evidence to be the most important evidence in the debate. Some simply talked about their personal needs and how certain obstacles were preventing them reaching their goals. Others spoke more ‘for’ their institution, which felt more like a policy position rather than a personal aspiration. The one person moderating this debate seemed to try to connect and focus the different people on a common thread and discussion.

2.2 Evidence Café process and discussion objects