Skip to content
Health, Sports & Psychology

Pester power

Updated Tuesday 27th February 2007

How powerful is pester power? Do children really influence what food and products their parents will buy?

I was struck by the claim that one in five parents in the Money Programme ‘Cost of Kids’ survey admitted to buying new gadgets after pressure from their children, with much of the resulting expenditure ending up on credit cards. The example was consumer electronics companies recruiting our kids to get us to buy gadgets that we don’t need at prices we can’t afford, and only they know how to work. But more worrying is the evidence that pester power, or the ‘nag factor’ as it’s known in America, could be costing us more than money. By encouraging them to ask for the wrong kind of food and drink it’s costing some of our children their health.

From the forum - "the trick to keeping costs down is to think differently and keep things natural"

Marketing first woke up to children in the middle of the 20th century, particularly their power to influence adult purchasing. It began to aim products directly at them rather than having them make do with modified versions of adult products. In many ways this has been a good thing. Taking account of children’s needs in designing products such as holidays, cars or clothing makes a lot of sense. But in other areas, such as fizzy drinks, pre-sweetened cereals and fast food, the effect has been to promote fun and taste well beyond any sense of nutritional value. The vast majority of the food advertising seen by children is for such high fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) foods. Any parent who wants to do the best for their children’s dietary habits has a struggle on their hands as a result.

Advertisers deny deliberately setting parents at odds with their children. Industry codes of practice explicitly forbid such tactics, and pundits argue that pestering has much more to do with age than ads. But there is plenty of evidence from consumer research that parents are uncomfortably aware of ceding to demands stimulated by child-directed advertising. One recent study in Sweden revealed that parents actively avoided supermarket shopping accompanied by their children because of the stress it caused. And a widely-used UK market research report on marketing to children underlines the importance of ‘influenced purchasing’.

Opponents in the pester power debate are not shy of throwing contradictory research findings at each other to support their respective positions. But how good is the evidence, and which way does it point? To answer this question OU Business School and our partners in the Institute of Social Marketing recently reviewed a selection of key research articles evaluating the effect of food promotion on children’s attempts to influence purchasing by adults. We only looked at studies meeting strict quality and relevance criteria. They covered children in different parts of the world (US, UK, Saudi Arabia and India), and used a variety of methodologies. Yet they all concurred that food promotion does indeed stimulate demands from children for HFSS foods, increasing conflict in the supermarket aisles and leading in many cases to exasperated expenditure on less healthy products.

The food advertising industry, pointing to its record of self-regulation in the UK, claims that tightening further the rules on advertising to children is disproportionate. It argues that advertising is only one of a number of factors guiding what children want to eat, and that its effect is negligible compared to, say, the influence of parents, schools or peers. But even if advertising on its own only accounted for 2% of the variation in children’s food choice and consequent obesity (as has been suggested by some researchers), the cumulative effect will leave a significant number with health problems.

Against this kind of controversy, Ofcom, the UK telecommunications regulator, has spent a year consulting on a number of different options to tighten up regulation. On 22nd February 2007 it issued new rules banning HFSS food ads from programming likely to be popular with under 16s by the end of the year. While this looks like good news for any harassed parents out there, it has been greeted with dismay by health campaigners for not going far enough (many wanted a total ban on such ads pre 9pm). Industry bodies are not happy either, criticising the definitional criteria for HFSS foods as inconsistent. Furthermore, Ofcom’s announcement included a commitment to reviewing the effectiveness and scope of the new arrangements in autumn 2008, which seems rather early in the day to be looking for conclusive results. You may be sure that this controversy will not be over till the, er, fat lady sings.

Further reading

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Ads of our time – are teens susceptible to food ads in digital media? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Martin O'Brien, O'Brien Creative article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Ads of our time – are teens susceptible to food ads in digital media?

The OU's Dr Mimi Tatlow-Golden discusses what psychology can tell us about teens’ susceptibility to food ads in digital media. 

Article
Sometimes a bunny is just a bunny: The Playboy brand and sexualisation of children Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Michalakis Ppalis | Dreamstime.com article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Sometimes a bunny is just a bunny: The Playboy brand and sexualisation of children

Beyond the tabloid-fuelled rage at Playboy products apparently aimed at children is a much more nuanced relationship with the Bunny brand.

Article
The family at the centre of early learning Copyright free image Icon Copyright free: Courtesy: Karen Horsley. free course icon Level 1 icon

Education & Development 

The family at the centre of early learning

This free course, The family at the centre of early learning, focuses on the positive learning relationships that can exist in any family and how ordinary, everyday domestic activities can sustain learning. You will consider how the traditions and cultural practices of the community to which the family belongs filters through to the child’s experiences. In doing so you will think about why such influences may not have a uniform impact from family to family. You will also explore how learning is a two way experience for both children and their parents or carers, in situations both within and beyond the home.

Free course
9 hrs
Social work: Effective practice with substance abusing parents Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Stephanie Slater video icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Social work: Effective practice with substance abusing parents

What is like being a social worker? Dr Andy Taylor of The Open University discusses effective practice with substance abusing parents. 

Video
10 mins
Involving the family in supporting pupils' literacy learning Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 3 icon

Education & Development 

Involving the family in supporting pupils' literacy learning

Teaching children to read is one area where collaboration between teachers and parents/carers is of vital importance. In this free course, Involving the family in supporting pupils' literacy learning, you will examine how families and schools work together to establish the links that underpin childhood literacy development and the ways in which educational institutions respond to the diversity of needs amongst students.

Free course
10 hrs
Early adopters: What are smartphones doing to children? Creative commons image Icon Steve Paine under Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0 license article icon

Education & Development 

Early adopters: What are smartphones doing to children?

Children - very young children - are adept at using iPads and other touchscreen technologies. Should we worry? Probably not, says Olivia Solon.

Article
Parents as partners Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 1 icon

Education & Development 

Parents as partners

In this free course we look at the notion of parents as partners. We identify a cluster of reasons why partnership is considered important - for children, parents and practitioners - and give examples of ways in which it can be interpreted in practice. We also outline a conceptual framework to accommodate the possible range of parental involvement and partnership practice.

Free course
16 hrs
Bedfordshire Mencap Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 2 icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Bedfordshire Mencap

This free course, Bedfordshire Mencap, enables you to hear some of the founding members of the Bedfordshire Mencap organisation talk about how the organisation was established and the wide range of support services it offers. The work that individuals exerted to promote change is a source of pressure towards the ideal that parents should be supported in their task of bringing up children with learning difficulties.

Free course
1 hr
Parents and toddlers: Teaching and learning at home Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 3 icon

Education & Development 

Parents and toddlers: Teaching and learning at home

How do young children learn? This free course, Parents and toddlers: Teaching and learning at home, looks at the way toddlers interact with their carers in the home environment. You will learn how adults use different methods of teaching to encourage a small child to expand their boundaries and develop new ways of thinking.

Free course
20 hrs