Skip to content
Health, Sports & Psychology

Regenerating the Doctor

Updated Monday 18th November 2013

In the past fifty years, we have seen many faces of the Doctor. But how do we identify them as the same person? Dr Keith Frankish explores the philosophy of personal identity.

Doctor who different faces Creative commons image Icon Doctor Who Spoilers under CC-BY licence under Creative-Commons license ‘I’ve had many faces, many lives,’ says the Doctor in a trailer for the fiftieth-anniversary episode of Doctor Who. The Doctor has indeed had many lives, regenerating from peevish grandfather to quick-witted clown to impatient dandy, and so on, through to the awkward young man played by Matt Smith. This is, of course, a consequence of the need to recast the central character every few years, but, unlike other long-running series (such as the Bond movies), where the change of face goes unnoticed within the fictional world, Doctor Who has a fictional counterpart for recasting, regeneration. And because of this, the change can be a radical one, permitting the show’s creators to re-imagine the central character every few years and allowing new fans to develop an attachment to their ‘own’ doctor.

But regeneration is a strange notion. How can one person have many lives, especially as such different people? How is the situation different from one in which several distinct people succeed each other? Maybe regeneration kills the old Doctor and produces a completely new timelord who just thinks he’s the Doctor? We can ask similar questions about ourselves. We go through many changes in our lives, passing from child to youth to adult to pensioner. These transformations are not as dramatic as the Doctor’s regenerations, but they are major ones, and again we can ask why different life-stages are episodes in the life of a single person, rather than distinct people. This is the question of what philosophers call personal identity.

Most philosophers agree that the unifying factor is continuity of some kind, though they disagree as to what kind. On one view, bodily continuity is crucial: the pensioner’s body is a natural development of the bodies of the earlier stages. Another view focuses on psychological continuity: the pensioner’s mind is continuous with the minds of the earlier stages – they share memories and other mental states, and there are causal connections between their minds. On the first view, a person is essentially a body, on the second, essentially a mind. To test your intuitions on this, imagine a science-fiction mind swap. Suppose Jack’s mental states (memories, beliefs, desires, hopes, and so on) are temporarily transferred to Jill’s brain. Which would you say is the best description of the situation: that Jack has temporarily lost his mind (Jack being essentially a body) or that Jack temporarily has a different body (Jack being essentially a mind)?

How does this apply to regeneration? Well, if people are essentially minds, then it seems the Doctor does survive regeneration. His memories, beliefs, desires, and so on are transferred intact to the new body (allowing for temporary post-regeneration amnesia). However, if bodily continuity is what matters, then things are not so clear. What exactly happens during regeneration? Is the old Doctor’s body reorganised very rapidly, or is it obliterated and replaced with a new one? In the former case the new body is continuous with the old one, and the Doctor survives, but in the latter the Doctor dies and is replaced by someone else who thinks he is the Doctor. It’s not clear which interpretation is correct, especially as the regeneration effect has changed over the years. (Prior to the Doctor’s fourth regeneration, a replacement body followed the Doctor around for a while, in the guise of the Watcher.) Maybe the Doctor has survived some regenerations and not others.

Things get even more complicated when regeneration goes wrong. In the episode ‘Journey’s End’, the tenth Doctor undergoes an abortive regeneration that results in the creation of a duplicate Doctor, identical except for being angrier and lacking the ability to regenerate. This duplicate (now living in a parallel universe with Rose) is psychologically continuous with the tenth Doctor, and may be more similar to him than the eleventh Doctor is. So maybe he is the real Doctor, and Matt Smith has been playing an unwitting imposter?

If this isn’t enough, consider those occasions when two incarnations of the Doctor meet (as in the anniversary episode). How can two co-existing people be the very same person? They can’t both be the whole Doctor, as it were. One option is to think of the Doctor as the amalgam of all the different Doctor stages that exist at particular times. On this view the whole Doctor is a ‘spacetime worm’ that is spread out in the fourth dimension of time as well as in the three dimensions of space, and what exists at any given moment is just a thin slice of this worm. In multi-doctor stories the Doctor worm has coiled back on itself, and two different slices of it meet each other. This view is called four dimensionalism, and there are reasons for thinking that it is true of us too.

Of course, we don’t worry about these questions as we watch Doctor Who. We just accept the person on screen as the Doctor. But the fact that the show so vividly illustrates these (and many more) philosophical problems is another reason for loving it. And however puzzling regeneration is, it is a brilliant device for keeping the show fresh and preserving the air of mystery and unpredictability around its central character. As the show enters its second half-century, we fans look forward to discovering more of the Doctor’s faces and lives.

Visit Keith's website www.keithfrankish.com to explore more of the mind of a philospher. 

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Methods in Motion: Is Q still the answer? Creative commons image Icon Annette Dubois under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 license article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Methods in Motion: Is Q still the answer?

Paul Stenner considers social constructionism - and wonders if it ever-changing times means research methods also need to change.

Article
OU on the BBC: Background Brief - Is The Sun Bad For You? The Story So Far Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

OU on the BBC: Background Brief - Is The Sun Bad For You? The Story So Far

Following the sun may not always be such a good idea. Janice Acquah finds out more.

Article
A reader's guide to The Grass Is Singing Creative commons image Icon Elke Wetzig under CC-BY-SA licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

A reader's guide to The Grass Is Singing

Doris Lessing's debut novel drew deep on her experiences in 1950s Rhodesia.

Article
Digging up Spain's dead: introduction Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University video icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Digging up Spain's dead: introduction

During Franco's dictatorship, many people who tried to stand against him were murdered and buried in unmarked graves. Over 30 years after his death in 1975, Spain is breaking its self-imposed silence - and we hear from three people, whose families were devasted when loved ones were killed by the Franco regime, as they try to find their relatives' remains.

Video
5 mins
Olympic Shorts: Family influences Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University video icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Olympic Shorts: Family influences

In this Olympic Shorts video featuring interviews with athletes such as Usain Bolt, Ben Oakley talks about the influence of family on the development of young athletes

Video
5 mins
Troubled waters: Join the debate Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: By marinephotobank via Flickr under Creative Commons 2.0 article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Troubled waters: Join the debate

The immediate, and horrendous, effects of the recent oil leak in the Gulf have been widely covered by the news - sea creatures smothered in toxic, treacle-like crude oil. But what are the long-term impacts to the marine ecosystem and can previous oil spills help with our predictions? Join the debate by adding your comments underneath Dr Ash's insight.

Article
OU on the BBC: Breaking the Seal - Programme three - Military history Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Production team article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

OU on the BBC: Breaking the Seal - Programme three - Military history

Introducing a programme in the 'Breaking the Seal' series which investigates military records.

Article
99Rewind: Is ‘statewide’ politics better than devolved politics? Creative commons image Icon By Futureshape via Flickr under Creative Commons license under Creative-Commons license article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

99Rewind: Is ‘statewide’ politics better than devolved politics?

In an extract from his recent Welsh Governance Centre’s St David’s Day lecture, Professor of Politics at Edinburgh University Charlie Jeffery looks at how academics analyse the importance and role of ‘regional’ and ‘state’ government and politics.

Article
OU on the BBC: Blue Sky - Spaced out Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Production team article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

OU on the BBC: Blue Sky - Spaced out

Professor Martin Kemp, an art historian, and Professor Sir Roger Penrose, a mathematician and physicist, discuss how they are bridging the Art versus Science divide.

Article