Skip to content

Nigel Warburton on... blame

Updated Thursday 6th March 2008

What standards do we apply when we apportion blame? Are there degrees of censure?

While working as a school teacher in 1926, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein hit an eleven year old child so hard that the child collapsed. This was undoubtedly a terrible thing to do, and there was an investigation in the school. But in 1926 it was commonplace to use corporal punishment as a teaching technique. Today in Britain, fortunately, it isn't. Indeed the NSPCC has mounted a campaign to protect children legally from physical punishment.

So is it wrong to judge teachers of the past by today's standards? An easy response is to appeal to ethical relativism. This is the idea that all our judgments of right and wrong, praise and blame, and so on, are relative to the time and place when the relevant acts were performed. On this view it may have been right to control a child by using physical punishment in the 1920s (within limits which Wittgenstein overstepped); whereas it would be morally abhorrent now. Ethical relativism is, however, deeply unsatisfactory and hard to sustain with consistency.

Miranda Fricker in her discussion of this topic for the podcast series Ethics Bites has some interesting things to say. She is surely right that it is a condition of blaming someone that we believe that they could have chosen to act differently. It is wrong to blame someone for something over which they have no control, such as their height.

In the case of Wittgenstein's act, we can rightly blame him: even by the standards of his day he was brutal. There would be nothing anachronistic in that. But if he had caned the child within the limits accepted in 1926, should we hold him blameworthy? Miranda points out that we do want to have some sort of negative attitude to people who did things like this in the past, even though they couldn't necessarily have known any better. Yet blame implies that they could have known better.

We need a richer moral vocabulary to account for our feelings here. Clearly some of Wittgenstein's contemporaries would have thought that all corporal punishment of children was wrong: these were exceptional people who could see beyond the dominant perspective. We appropriately feel moral disappointment at the child-hitters of the past. We are sad that people behaved that way, recognize that, though it would have been difficult, they might have thought differently and judge appropriately. We can't exactly blame them, because that implies that they might have done otherwise. But at the same time, we don't want to have a neutral attitude to them. We are disappointed in them.

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Appearance and reality: in conversation with Derren Brown  Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University video icon

History & The Arts 

Appearance and reality: in conversation with Derren Brown

Nigel Warburton talks to psychological illusionist Derren Brown about appearance and reality, and what kind of people are most gullible.

Video
10 mins
Philosophy: The nature of persons Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 3 icon

History & The Arts 

Philosophy: The nature of persons

What is a person? This free course, Philosophy: The nature of persons, examines this philosophical question concerning the nature of personhood. You will examine whether a 'person' is the same as a 'human being', and look at whether it is our free will that in the end defines us as a 'person'.

Free course
15 hrs
How can I know anything at all? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

How can I know anything at all?

These short animations explore how we can know anything at all. 

Video
20 mins
Assisted conception: Do you have a right to have a child? Creative commons image Icon Einaphets 32 under CC-BY-NC-ND licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

History & The Arts 

Assisted conception: Do you have a right to have a child?

Do we have a right to have babies? And is that even a simple question?

Article
Trust and the state of nature Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

History & The Arts 

Trust and the state of nature

Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), perhaps the greatest English political philosopher, argued that life in the state of nature would be, "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short". But what is the state of nature? Need it be so miserable? And why does this matter, anyway? Jonathan Wolff, Professor of Philosophy, University College London, considers the issues.

Article
Michael Sandel on... Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University video icon

History & The Arts 

Michael Sandel on...

Harvard philosophy expert Michael Sandel gives us exclusive video insights into his views on eminent thinkers such as Kant, Bentham and Aristotle

Video
5 mins
The Buddha – Ancient Teachings for the Modern World Creative commons image Icon Photo Dharma under CC-BY-SA licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

History & The Arts 

The Buddha – Ancient Teachings for the Modern World

Dr Helen Waterhouse explains how the Buddha’s teachings have stayed relevant over time and place.

Article
Confucian Ancestor Worship Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

Confucian Ancestor Worship

This short animation, narrated by Aidan Turner, looks at Confucian ideals surrounding family and worshipping ancestors. 

Video
5 mins
Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

History & The Arts 

Karl Marx (1818 - 1883)

Introducing the life and thoughts of Karl Marx

Article