Skip to content

Nigel Warburton on... the case against perfection

Updated Wednesday 12th March 2008

Should we allow genetic and performance enhancement in sport?

As the controversy about Dwain Chambers, a British sprinter who was found guilty of cheating by using illegal performance-enhancing drugs rumbles on, Ethics Bites considers a more basic question. Chambers was shown to be a cheat - he clearly broke the rules. But should we allow other kinds of performance enhancement in sport? Should we make genetic enhancement part of sport?

Biotechnology is opening up many possibilities. Athletes will soon be able to inject chemicals that will produce genetic modifications that will dramatically improve their performance; parents will be able to specify many genetically controlled qualities for their offspring. This is not the world our parents and grandparents inhabited. How should we treat these developments?

In his podcast for Ethics Bites, the Harvard philosopher Michael Sandel comes out firmly against the pursuit of perfection by genetic enhancement. He explains why, for example, he thinks it would be wrong to permit genetically enhanced athletes to compete. He, of course, defends biotechnical solutions to medical problems. It is when we attempt to enhance ourselves that he objects.

Much of his argument turns on his notion of 'giftedness'. An athlete, for example, has a natural genetic endowment. According to Sandel, to go beyond this 'gift' is a kind of hubris on our part, a Promethean project that involves playing God. This sounds like a theological position. But Sandel believes his reasoning should have force with secularists too.

For Sandel there are three features of our moral landscape that will be transformed if we succumb to this desire to play God:

  1. Humility. We will lose the sense of reverence that is appropriate to our fate. Instead we will end up acting with hubris towards our nature.
  2. Responsibility. With increases in choice about what we are, responsibility explodes. The consequence will be burdensome.
  3. Perhaps most important, though, is solidarity. Sandel believes that the price of enhancement would be a loss of human solidarity. Once we lose the sense that we are subject to contingencies of fate, the successful will, even more than now, see themselves as self-made. And this will be bad for all of us.

Sandel's message is clear:

Rather than employ our new genetic powers to straighten 'the crooked timber of humanity,' we should do what we can to create social and political arrangements more hospitable to the gifts and limitations of imperfect human beings

Much of Sandel's argument will appeal to religious believers, particularly those who seek humility before God's will. But for atheists and agnostics, this could be harder to stomach. Why not improve ourselves if we can? Think of how wonderful it would be if we could increase the number of geniuses per capita, particularly if we could give them a compassion gene and a desire to improve the lot of humanity...

In the area of sport much of Sandel's argument turns on his belief that watching bionic athletes slugging it out would become mere spectacle, and that part of what we value in sport is the limitations of the athletes. I'm not so sure about this. I'd like to watch a football match in which every player achieved the skill level of George Best or Maradona. And watching the top marathon runners today is already like watching bionic athletes, but no less absorbing for us mere mortals.

Sandel's arguments are interesting and thought-provoking. For some of the arguments on the other side of the debate, try John Harris's book Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. He presents an uncompromising defence of safe enhancement:

Enhancements are so obviously good for us that it is odd that the idea of enhancement has caused, and still occasions, so much suspicion, fear, and outright hostility.

Further Reading

  • The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering by Michael Sandel, published by Belknap Press
  • Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People by John Harris, published by Princeton University Press

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Rio 2016: A Caster Semenya reading list Creative commons image Icon Citizen59 under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license video icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Rio 2016: A Caster Semenya reading list

Caster Semenya's 800 metres victory at Rio hasn't been met with universal acclaim, as it reopens the debate over hyperadrogenic atheletes.

10 mins
Exploring sport online: Athletes and efficient hearts Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 1 icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Exploring sport online: Athletes and efficient hearts

We all know that the heart is very important but what exactly does the heart do? Why is the blood so important? What functions do the lungs perform? In this free course, Exploring sport online: Athletes and efficient hearts, we will try to provide at least a basic understanding so we can answer these questions and begin to understand why knowing about the heart is important for all sports people. Before that we will take a look at the human body.

Free course
5 hrs
A head for heights: How athletes keep calm at altitude Creative commons image Icon London Youth Games Limited via WikiCommons under CC-BY-SA licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

A head for heights: How athletes keep calm at altitude

Athletes at Sochi 2014 find themselves at the top end of runs which threaten injury as much as promise victory. How do you cope with that?

Why would British athletes choose winter sports? Creative commons image Icon S. Yume under CC-BY licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Why would British athletes choose winter sports?

What's the attraction of winter sports in a mild climate?

Olympisize Me activity icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Olympisize Me

Have you ever wondered which sport you're most suited to? Play this interactive game to find out if you’ve got what it takes physically, psychologically and socially to make it to the podium at the Olympics and Paralympics.

Olympics 2012 Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: London 2012 / Getty article icon

History & The Arts 

Olympics 2012

Play games, learn for free and see what Open University academics have to say about the world's biggest sporting event with our dedicated Olympics portal

Healthy bodies; gendered images Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Stuart Pearcey | article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Healthy bodies; gendered images

Society is still obsessed by the size zero ideal for women. Kath Woodward observes that even Olympic gold medal winners have no escape. Will 2012 be different?

Sport and genetic enhancement Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission audio icon

History & The Arts 

Sport and genetic enhancement

How far should athletes go in pursuit of the podium? Can you build yourself up while protecting your ethics?

15 mins
Sex, gender and speed Creative commons image Icon José Goulão under CC-BY-NC-ND licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

Society, Politics & Law 

Sex, gender and speed

Professor Kath Woodward considers the issues that are raised by the media's coverage of gender verification tests for female athletes