The principle of double effect

Updated Wednesday 27th February 2008

Is there a difference between deliberately killing someone and doing something that will lead to their death? Nigel Warburton explores the Doctrine of Double Effect.

Some people believe there is a significant moral difference between deliberately killing someone and performing an action that you know will result in another's death. These people subscribe to what is known as the Doctrine of Double Effect, a principle drawing a distinction between intentionally doing something undesirable and doing something where you foresee an undesirable consequence, but don’t wish this consequence. The name 'Double Effect' comes from the fact that the action in question is thought to have two effects: a good one (intended) and a bad one (merely foreseen).

It may sound esoteric, but this principle has many vitally important applications: for example in medical cases. A doctor may justify administering a lethal pain-killing drug that predictably hastens a patient's death on the grounds that she aims to lessen the patient's pain rather than kill him. 

Critics of this view, including strict utilitarians, will say that if the predictable consequences are the same, the moral worth of the actions must be the same. If you know your actions will result in a death, what difference can it make if you intend this death, rather than merely foresee it? Some of those who subscribe to the Doctrine of Double Effect do so because they are members of a religion that has an absolute prohibition on intentional killing; from outside these religions the double effect doctrine can look like a convenient kind of conscience-saving rationalization. 

Through a series of ingenious, if highly implausible, thought experiments involving out-of-control trolleys, innocent people tied to railway tracks (and, in one case, a fat man pushed over a bridge), Michael Otsuka defends the Doctrine. In this weeks’ Ethics Bites, he claims that our intuitions about these cases support the Doctrine. 

I'm not completely convinced he's right. Perhaps what we need to do is abandon our intuitions, rather than stick to the Doctrine.

Further Reading

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

What does it mean to be free? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

What does it mean to be free?

This series of animations explore the question: what does it mean to be free? 

Video
30 mins
Wittgenstein’s Beetle in the Box Analogy Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

Wittgenstein’s Beetle in the Box Analogy

This animation looks at Wittgenstein's thinking that problems were caused by a 'bewitchment of language'.

Video
5 mins
Sartre: Love is a hazardous, painful struggle Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

Sartre: Love is a hazardous, painful struggle

This short animation, narrated by Aidan Turner, shows the conflict and danger of love from Jean-Paul Sartre's perspective. 

Video
5 mins
Niccolò Machiavelli (1469 - 1527) Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

History & The Arts 

Niccolò Machiavelli (1469 - 1527)

Introducing the Florentine thinker and political theorist, Niccolò Macchiavelli:

Article
Is Utopia a pointless dream? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

History & The Arts 

Is Utopia a pointless dream?

Not short of a bob or two, Ian Hislop must know what it’s like to live in a perfect world. Or does he? Ever Wondered sent him to America with nothing but a copy of Thomas More’s Utopia to find if there is such a thing as a perfect world...

Article
Annette Baier (1929 - ) Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Controlled article icon

History & The Arts 

Annette Baier (1929 - )

Introducing New Zealand born moral philosopher Annette Baier:

Article
Why should we care about climate change? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Production team - grabbed from rough cut audio icon

History & The Arts 

Why should we care about climate change?

Why should we care about the future generations who’ll be affected by global warming? Should the West shoulder the responsibility for tackling climate change?

Audio
15 mins
The Is / Ought Problem Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

The Is / Ought Problem

Our animation explores the is/ought problem.

Video
5 mins
If a pig gives you a new liver, do you give the pig rights? Creative commons image Icon Liquid emulsion under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license article icon

History & The Arts 

If a pig gives you a new liver, do you give the pig rights?

Science is pushing ahead developing human-animal chimera creatures. Ethicists need to keep up to be ready for them, says Joshua Shepherd.

Article