The principle of double effect

Updated Wednesday 27th February 2008

Is there a difference between deliberately killing someone and doing something that will lead to their death? Nigel Warburton explores the Doctrine of Double Effect.

Some people believe there is a significant moral difference between deliberately killing someone and performing an action that you know will result in another's death. These people subscribe to what is known as the Doctrine of Double Effect, a principle drawing a distinction between intentionally doing something undesirable and doing something where you foresee an undesirable consequence, but don’t wish this consequence. The name 'Double Effect' comes from the fact that the action in question is thought to have two effects: a good one (intended) and a bad one (merely foreseen).

It may sound esoteric, but this principle has many vitally important applications: for example in medical cases. A doctor may justify administering a lethal pain-killing drug that predictably hastens a patient's death on the grounds that she aims to lessen the patient's pain rather than kill him. 

Critics of this view, including strict utilitarians, will say that if the predictable consequences are the same, the moral worth of the actions must be the same. If you know your actions will result in a death, what difference can it make if you intend this death, rather than merely foresee it? Some of those who subscribe to the Doctrine of Double Effect do so because they are members of a religion that has an absolute prohibition on intentional killing; from outside these religions the double effect doctrine can look like a convenient kind of conscience-saving rationalization. 

Through a series of ingenious, if highly implausible, thought experiments involving out-of-control trolleys, innocent people tied to railway tracks (and, in one case, a fat man pushed over a bridge), Michael Otsuka defends the Doctrine. In this weeks’ Ethics Bites, he claims that our intuitions about these cases support the Doctrine. 

I'm not completely convinced he's right. Perhaps what we need to do is abandon our intuitions, rather than stick to the Doctrine.

Further Reading

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Can you believe in miracles? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

Can you believe in miracles?

This animation, narrated by Aidan Turner, explores David Hume's thinking behind miracles versus extraordinary events.

Video
5 mins
How should we live together? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

How should we live together?

Watch these animations on the subject of how we can live together. 

Video
30 mins
At the centre of things: Rebekah Ley Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Rebekah Ley audio icon

History & The Arts 

At the centre of things: Rebekah Ley

The Open University's Derek Matravers talks to Rebekah Ley, Convenor of the clinical ethics committee for Addenbrookes Hospital

Audio
5 mins
Organ transplants Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC audio icon

History & The Arts 

Organ transplants

I need money. He needs a kidney. It should be win-win. Is there a case for allowing paid organ transplants?

Audio
15 mins
Technology and trust Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC article icon

History & The Arts 

Technology and trust

What does the increasing surveillance of our personal movement say about trust in our society?

Article
A Change In World View Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Production team article icon

History & The Arts 

A Change In World View

Derek Matravers explores the origins of Romanticism.

Article
Two concepts of freedom Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 2 icon

History & The Arts 

Two concepts of freedom

What defines individual freedom in a civilised society? Philosophers have argued over such questions for centuries. This free course, Two concepts of freedom, looks at a positive and a negative concept of freedom, asking you to think carefully about how freedom is restricted by our place in society and how it can vary from state to state.

Free course
20 hrs

History & The Arts 

Imagination: The missing mystery of philosophy

What is imagination and can philosophy define it in any meaningful way? This free course, Imagination: The missing mystery of philosophy, will introduce you to some of the possible answers to these questions and will examine why philosophy has sometimes found it difficult to approach imagination. It will then go on to examine the relationship that imagination has to imagery and supposition, charting where these concepts overlap with imagination and where they diverge.

Free course
20 hrs
Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Tilemahos Efthimiadis under CC-BY-SA licence article icon

History & The Arts 

Aristotle (384 - 322 BC)

Introducing the Greek philosopher, Aristotle

Article