Skip to content

The principle of double effect

Updated Wednesday 27th February 2008

Is there a difference between deliberately killing someone and doing something that will lead to their death? Nigel Warburton explores the Doctrine of Double Effect.

Some people believe there is a significant moral difference between deliberately killing someone and performing an action that you know will result in another's death. These people subscribe to what is known as the Doctrine of Double Effect, a principle drawing a distinction between intentionally doing something undesirable and doing something where you foresee an undesirable consequence, but don’t wish this consequence. The name 'Double Effect' comes from the fact that the action in question is thought to have two effects: a good one (intended) and a bad one (merely foreseen).

It may sound esoteric, but this principle has many vitally important applications: for example in medical cases. A doctor may justify administering a lethal pain-killing drug that predictably hastens a patient's death on the grounds that she aims to lessen the patient's pain rather than kill him. 

Critics of this view, including strict utilitarians, will say that if the predictable consequences are the same, the moral worth of the actions must be the same. If you know your actions will result in a death, what difference can it make if you intend this death, rather than merely foresee it? Some of those who subscribe to the Doctrine of Double Effect do so because they are members of a religion that has an absolute prohibition on intentional killing; from outside these religions the double effect doctrine can look like a convenient kind of conscience-saving rationalization. 

Through a series of ingenious, if highly implausible, thought experiments involving out-of-control trolleys, innocent people tied to railway tracks (and, in one case, a fat man pushed over a bridge), Michael Otsuka defends the Doctrine. In this weeks’ Ethics Bites, he claims that our intuitions about these cases support the Doctrine. 

I'm not completely convinced he's right. Perhaps what we need to do is abandon our intuitions, rather than stick to the Doctrine.

Further Reading

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic

The founder of sociology, Max Weber drilled in the value of hard work into our everyday ethic. 

Video
5 mins
How can I know anything at all? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

How can I know anything at all?

These short animations explore how we can know anything at all. 

Video
20 mins
Nigel Warburton on... what's wrong with killing? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University article icon

History & The Arts 

Nigel Warburton on... what's wrong with killing?

We often lose sight of the human consequences of war. Photographers can play an important role in reminding us.

Article
Introducing philosophy Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission free course icon Level 1 icon

History & The Arts 

Introducing philosophy

Ever wondered what it would be like to study philosophy? This free course, Introducing philosophy, will introduce you to the teaching methods employed and the types of activities and assignments you would be asked to undertake should you wish to study philosophy and the human situation.

Free course
8 hrs
John Locke on Toleration Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: BBC video icon

History & The Arts 

John Locke on Toleration

This short animation, narrated by Aidan Turner, explores persuading people to change their beliefs by force. 

Video
5 mins
Nigel Warburton on... cause and correlation Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: photos.com article icon

History & The Arts 

Nigel Warburton on... cause and correlation

Nigel explains the dangers of cause and correlation, rash generalisations and straw men.

Article
Sandel on Aristotle's thoughts on the good life Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University video icon

History & The Arts 

Sandel on Aristotle's thoughts on the good life

Sandel asks if there are many different kinds of the good life

Video
5 mins
Review: The Idea Of Justice Creative commons image Icon OECD under CC-BY-NC-ND licence under Creative-Commons license article icon

History & The Arts 

Review: The Idea Of Justice

The urgency for philosophers to abandon their castles in the air is caught in Amartya Sen's The Idea Of Justice, says Charles Barclay Roger.

Article
The Death of Socrates article icon

History & The Arts 

The Death of Socrates

Why was Socrates killed? Learn the reasons for his death.

Article