Skip to content
Author:

What Did Gutenberg Invent?: Conclusions

Updated Thursday, 1st September 2005

It appears that the development of modern printing might not have been as swift as we once believed

This page was published over five years ago. Please be aware that due to the passage of time, the information provided on this page may be out of date or otherwise inaccurate, and any views or opinions expressed may no longer be relevant. Some technical elements such as audio-visual and interactive media may no longer work. For more detail, see our Archive and Deletion Policy

Quill

Blaise Aguera y Arcas and Paul Needham concluded that Gutenberg did invent movable type, but his method of creating or casting each letter was different to the way we've always thought. They hypothesise as to the actual method used.

Conclusions

Paul and Blaise's findings suggest that the development of the printing process was more gradual than previously thought. This helps to explain why Gutenberg needed so much money to produce this enormous book. Mistakes in the production process are expensive.

Hand printing Their working hypothesis on how Gutenberg created type is that a temporary mould was created, one letter cast and the process of taking the letter out of the mould disturbed the surface. So the same mould would have had to be recreated to make the second letter.

Paul and Blaise are continuing to use the same system of analysis to try to establish who did invent the punch and matrix. Their hunch is that it was likely to have occurred in the 1470s in Italy. They have a printer in mind but want to set about proving it before naming names.

 

Author

Share

Related content (tags)

Copyright information

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?