6 Is there a difference between ‘good science’ and ‘bad science’?

To answer this question, you first need to consider the scientific method. This approach is shown in Figure 5. You start at number one by defining the question. Then you go through options two to seven clockwise. If your observations don’t support your hypothesis then you leave at stage six and return to the experimental stage. Even if your hypothesis is supported by your observations, a good scientist will continue to seek further opportunities to disprove the hypothesis.

Figure 5 The scientific method.

Show description|Hide description

This is an image describing the scientific method in steps from 1 to 7 inclusive. 1 - define a question. 2 - make observations. 3 - form a hypothesis. 4 - experiment to test your hypothesis. 5 - analyse and interpret data. 6 - draw conclusions, do your observations support your hypothesis? If no then try again and make a new hypothesis and return to the 4th stage. If yes then to the 7th and final stage - communicate your findings.

Figure 5 The scientific method.

Table 2 summarises what qualifies as ‘good science’ and ‘bad science’.

So ‘good science’ contrasts to ‘bad science’ by approaching a problem with an open mind and ensuring that established standards are complied with. You should now complete the end-of-week quiz.