Rising China and Africa's development: oil
Rising China and Africa's development: oil

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

Free course

Rising China and Africa's development: oil

2.1 Business-minded China

In many ways, China’s approach is more business minded, one which sees the Chinese state supporting its firms in accessing resources and markets, often backed by lending from China’s banks. This approach has been termed mercantilist because the Chinese state encourages and incentivises its large firms to enter these markets. In terms of China accessing natural resources in Africa, there have been numerous deals, such as with the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia. For oil, China’s main interests have been in the Sudan/s (which will be discussed in Session 4), Angola, Algeria, Libya and Nigeria. The reaction of Western countries to Chinese mercantilism has largely been alarmist – that the Chinese are muscling in on markets in ‘unfair’ ways.

Described image
Figure 7 Cartoon demonstrating US concerns that China’s suddenly increasing growth has surpassed the US

These supposedly unfair ways include using aid to soften up leaders, turning a blind eye to authoritarianism, using tied bank loans, and overlooking labour and environmental standards. The Chinese have come into global oil at a time when major oil fields have been taken by the leading Western international oil companies (or IOCs) such as Shell, BP and ExxonMobil. As a result the Chinese National Oil Companies have to take what they can and this often means dealing with countries whose political systems are questionable. It is not that the ‘Communist’ Chinese prefer unaccountable states, but rather this is all they have access to. In reality Chinese firms want stability and manageable risks, and are increasingly joint-venturing with Western firms and African national oil companies. Watch Giles Mohan summarise Chinese interests.

Download this video clip.Video player: Video 3
Skip transcript: Video 3

Transcript: Video 3

The motivations for China's engagement in Africa are numerous, but the key ones, really, are economic and political. On the economic side, they're there to gather natural resources that can fuel their own development. So massive industrialisation, the cities are growing, they need all those raw materials to make that happen. On the other hand, they're also looking for markets for all of those goods. They produce a lot of stuff, they've got to get rid of it. And one of the places they can sell that is into the developing world, into Africa and other countries. China's relationship with Africa evolved over a number of centuries, really. There's evidence that they were first there in the 16th century. But we're really focusing on the last sort of 10 to 20 years. So under Chairman Mao in the last 60 years, there was some diplomatic relations. It was technical cooperation around certain things, around agriculture, for example. But as China's industrialised, it's sought those raw materials that it needs. So the last 15 years, we've seen a lot more engagement around accessing things like oil and minerals that they use for their own development. Politically, there's a set of issues really around how African countries can support China in some of its diplomatic claims. So the big one is all around the recognition of Taiwan. And so countries that don't recognise Taiwan, which broke away from China, tend to get more preferential treatment from the Chinese. And the Chinese like that because that gives them certain status within their negotiations about their rights over Taiwan. So it's a complicated issue but it's mainly economic and political.
End transcript: Video 3
Video 3
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Activity 1 Reactions to China’s global rise

China’s global rise has been greeted by some with alarm. Why might there be alarmist reactions from the West to China entering Africa?

Spend 10 minutes noting down three possible reactions and the reasons underpinning them.

Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).


There is no ‘correct’ answer to this activity, but here are some of the reasons that have circulated over the past 20 years or so. There are also some of the counter-arguments.


The Chinese deal with dictatorsuncritically and so perpetuate insecurity, persecution and lack of human rights. But, equally, Western companies have dealt with authoritarian leaders without too many qualms. Also, in the oil sector the older fields are already sewn up by the IOCs so China has had to take what it can get, which means dealing with some less democratic states.

The Chinese exploit African economies and extract both commodities and profits without giving much back. Likewise many Western companies have exploited Africa.

The Chinese ignore labour, environmental and other standards which is not only inherently damaging to the people and planet, but gives the Chinese unfair commercial advantages compared to other firms. There is truth in this to some degree, but some Western firms have also been lax over such standards.

The Chinese are taking over spheres of influence that have been under the direct and indirect control of Western powers for the last few centuries. This is true, but it raises the question of whether any external power should seek to dominate another country or region.

The Chinese Communist system is anti-democratic and so goes against ‘good’ political systems, such as those developed in the West. The Chinese system has become less open of late and this is worrying. But other states have also become more authoritarian and Western democracies are also not always worthy of emulation. Political voice has to be continually fought for and all countries are capable of moving along a scale of more or less openness.

The Chinese are untrustworthy and, despite what they say about caring for African development, we can’t always believe them. This is a very long-standing racial stereotype perpetrated in the West as a way of denigrating the Chinese, without any basis in truth.


Possibly the most concering thing running through these responses is that we are saying that the Chinese are ‘no worse’ than many Western powers who have intervened (some would say interfered) in Africa. The point is that Africa has consistently been treated as a supplier of raw materials to be exported for other countries’ industrial development and this has stilted the continent’s development.

The remainder of the course will address the realities on the ground as to what are the impacts of China’s expansion into Africa for the continent’s development. You start by looking at the transitions in China’s political and economic life that have led to the rising demand for African resources.


Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module, or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification. Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information.

Not ready for formal University study? Then browse over 1000 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus371