- Just how big was the Big Bang? Watch a video which shows scientists have calculated the exact volume of the noise created at the birth of the Universe.
At the instant of its origin, the Universe was a very high energy environment and was immensely hot. Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2 tells us that energy (E) and matter (m) are interchangeable, with the conversion factor being the speed of light (c) squared.
In the early Universe, a fraction of a second after it began, sub-atomic particles of matter and antimatter were therefore created spontaneously out of pure energy. In the earliest moments, all flavours of exotic particles were created in abundance, with almost equal amounts of matter and antimatter.
But note that phrase 'almost equal'. If the Universe had contained exactly equal amounts of matter and antimatter, then as the Universe cooled rapidly the particles and anti-particles would all have annihilated each other in the first fraction of a second after the Big Bang, leaving nothing except photons to exist throughout the Universe ever after.
A timeline of the history of the Universe: Click to download a larger, printable version
The fact that we do see matter around us today indicates that there was a slight excess of matter over antimatter, by about one part in a billion, in those earliest moments. So, for every billion matter and anti-matter particles that annihilated each other, just one particle of matter was left over. That tiny imbalance is what would subsequently allow the formation of all the galaxies, stars and planets that we observe throughout space.
A few millionths of a second after the Big Bang, familiar protons and neutrons began to form in the Universe from the particles left over after the initial flurry of annihilations.
Once formed, these continuously converted from one to the other, but since neutrons are slightly more massive than protons, the conversion of neutrons into protons happened more often than protons converted into neutrons. As a result, the positively charged protons began to outnumber their neutral counterparts, the neutrons.
Then, by the time the Universe was about 100 seconds old, they stopped interacting further, freezing out with a ratio of about 7 protons for every 1 neutron in the Universe. The Universe as a whole remained electrically neutral, since every positively charged proton was balanced by the existence of a negatively charged electron.
Over the next few minutes, protons and neutrons combined to form the first atomic nuclei. About three-quarters (by mass) remained as single protons (hydrogen nuclei) but most of the remaining one-quarter ended up as nuclei of helium-4 (comprising 2 protons and 2 neutrons), with tiny fractions of other light-weight isotopes such as deuterium, helium-3 and lithium-7.
Nothing much then happened until the Universe reached an age of around three hundred thousand years old. At this time, the Universe was cool enough for electrons to combine with nuclei to form the first atoms in the Universe. This 'epoch of recombination' as it is known, marks the furthest back in time that we can hope to see in the Universe. The light that we see today throughout space as the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, is the light from this epoch that’s been redshifted by the expansion of the Universe ever since.
Question: During the first few minutes of the Universe, only light elements such as hydrogen and helium were formed. Where did the rest of the elements come from? Share your answers using our Comments facility.
Find out more:
Find out more about the early Universe with this free course unit
Hear about some of the philosophical issues raised by the Big Bang in this video
Rate and Review
Rate this article
Review this article
Log into OpenLearn to leave reviews and join in the conversation.
Article reviews
The question asks "where did the rest of the elements come from?" citing the fact that hydrogen and helium were generated in the first few minutes. These were actually nuclei, are they classified as elements even though they're without their electrons at this time?
-----Old style comments (this format for comments is no longer supported but is still displayed for reference)------
john stovell - 5 January 2013 10:30am
I have problems understanding how our defintions of time and length are carried over to the conditions near the big bang. What does 10^-n secs or cms mean when n can be >> 1.
Andrew Norton - 5 January 2013 2:40pm
Negative powers of ten such as this as used to indicate very small quantities. For example, 10^-3 = 1/10^3 = 0.001 and 10^-6 = 1/10^6 = 0.000001. For very small numbers, the amount of zeros becomes very cumbersome so the shorthand notation is often used.
john stovell - 6 January 2013 7:37pm
Sorry about my badly formed question. It should have been.
I have problems understanding how our defintions of time and length are carried over to the conditions near the big bang. What does 10^-n secs or cms mean when n can be >> 1. Where the time is the age of the universe, and the distance is the size of the universe.
j.stovell@optec-consultants.co.uk