3.6 Predicting infidelity

Described image

To date we have been examining both the theories and research that seek to explain why human beings might engage in infidelity – non-sanctioned extra-dyadic sexual and/or emotional relationships versus engaging in consensual non-monogamy or monogamy. Much of the research we have considered is concerned with the function or individual benefits that accrue from different types of mating behaviour – i.e. theoretically why someone might cheat. A different kind of question is to ask empirically what factors might predict infidelity. There is a long-standing body of research which has used survey data to try to do exactly this. Such research is useful in counselling practice as it can help counsellors understand what might be ‘vulnerability factors’ for those in a couple relationship.

The table below is taken from Fincham and May (2017) and provides the authors’ summary of knowledge about infidelity predictors.

Table 1: Factors found to facilitate infidelity
Demographics 
GenderMales > females; however gender gap is closing
Minority statusAfrican American > Whites
Education, age, incomeAll have been related to infidelity but no consistent pattern of findings
Individual 
PersonalityNeuroticism, narcissism
Prior infidelity experienceInfidelity in family of origin; Previously engaged in infidelity
Number of sex partnersGreater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity
AlcoholProblematic drinking, alcohol dependence, illicit drug use
AttachmentInsecure attachment > secure attachment
Psychological distressGreater psychological distress associated with infidelity
AttitudesPermissive attitude toward sex; Decoupling of sex and love, closeness; Willingness to have casual sex
Relationship 
Relationship dissatisfactionDissatisfied > satisfied; Some evidence of bidirectional effects
CommitmentLower commitment > higher commitment
Cohabitation

Prior nonmarital cohabitation > marital cohabitation only; Premarital

cohabitation with spouse > no premarital habitation

Assortative matingPartners of same religion, levels of education less likely to cheat
Context 
WorkNumber of days spent traveling for work related to infidelity; Job requiring personal contact with potential sex partners; Larger fraction of opposite sex co-workers in work place related to infidelity for men; Both spouses employed associated with less cheating; One working spouse with other a stay at home spouse related to increased infidelity
ReligionLess infidelity is associated with: Attendance at religious services; Viewing the Bible as the literal word of God; Prayer focused on partner well-being
InternetGiven existence of sites that facilitate infidelity, casual sex, it is likely that visiting such sites promotes infidelity

Activity 3.6 Infidelity vulnerabilities

Timing: Allow 15 minutes

After you have looked at the table, try and answer the following questions:

By signing in and enrolling on this course you can view and complete all activities within the course, track your progress in My OpenLearn Create. and when you have completed a course, you can download and print a free Statement of Participation - which you can use to demonstrate your learning.

3.5 Functions and types of affairs

3.7 Characteristics of online affairs