Skip to content
Health, Sports & Psychology
  • Video
  • 5 mins
  • Level 1: Introductory

Misidentification: can you identify the criminal?

Updated Friday 9th April 2010

Professor Graham Pike from the Open University guides us through the eyewitness experience by viewing a crime and identity parade.

Watch

Copyright The Open University

Listen

Copyright The Open University

Read

Graham Pike: You’re about to see video footage of a staged crime. Please watch it carefully.

Do you think you would make a good witness if you were now interviewed by the police? Would you be able to remember everything about the crime? Can you remember what the person was wearing? Can you remember what the person took? Can you remember how many computers were in the office? Did the person have to unlock the door before entering the office? Although details such as these are important, perhaps the most important information the witness can provide relates to the identity of the perpetrator. As well as describing the appearance of the perpetrator, witnesses are also often asked to identify the perpetrator from an identification parade. Of course, the police first have to find and arrest a suspect before they ask the witness to make an identification, which usually means a gap of four to six weeks between the crime and the identity parade.

So let’s see how good a witness you would be. In a moment, we’re going to show you a photo line up. There will be a letter next to each of the photos in the line up. All you have to do is work out who the perpetrator is and remember their letter. Like most witnesses, you probably didn’t find it that easy to remember what the perpetrator looked like, so let’s work out how you did. Did you pick one of the letters? I’m afraid that if you picked any one from the identity parade you made a misidentification. The perpetrator of the crime you saw previously wasn’t in the parade. So if you picked out anyone, you picked out an innocent suspect. So if you did identify an innocent suspect, why was that? Psychological research has pointed to a number of reasons that could explain this.

Amongst these are the fact that our memory for unfamiliar faces is very inaccurate. The person you saw commit the crime was unfamiliar to you; you only saw them for a few seconds. It’s therefore very hard for you later to identify them, to recognise them. Secondly, you saw all the faces in the identity parade at the same time, that is they were presented simultaneously. When you see faces in the identity parade at the same time what you tend to do is try to pick the best match for the perpetrator, even if that person isn’t the perpetrator, so you look amongst all the faces and you pick the one that most resembles the perpetrator, even if it’s not them. Thirdly, it’s possible that you pick someone out from the line up because I told you to. At the beginning of the identity parade, the instruction that was used was a leading question, it suggested to you that the perpetrator was going to be in the parade because I said pick out who it is and remember their number, so maybe the reason you picked someone out was because you were told to.

Psychologists and the police have worked hard in the UK to overcome these problems, so suggestive questions are not used and the faces are shown one at a time to avoid witnesses simply picking the best match. However, it is very hard to overcome the fact that our memories tend to be very inaccurate. Misidentifications can lead to someone being prosecuted for a crime they did not commit. In 2007, DNA evidence finally exonerated Jerry Miller, who had spent 24 years in a prison for a rape he did not commit. His conviction was based on evidence from two eyewitnesses. Their misidentification led to an innocent person being imprisoned for most of their adult life whilst the real perpetrator walked free. Jerry Miller’s case was the 200th case the US Innocence Project successfully appealed using DNA evidence. Eye witness identifications played a role in 77% of these wrongful convictions.

 

 

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?

Other content you may like

Oliver Sacks: Creative commons image Icon Steve Jurvetson under CC-BY licence under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Oliver Sacks: "You are in the hands of a master storyteller"

The writer Josh Bernoff hails Oliver Sacks' ability to engage readers from the start.

Article
The dog beyond the mirror: Experiments with dog consciousness Creative commons image Icon Pup Fan under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

The dog beyond the mirror: Experiments with dog consciousness

Traditional mirror-based experiments might have sold dogs self-awareness short. New research using smell instead of sight suggests dogs might have self-consciousness.

Article
The Bisexuality Report Creative commons image Icon gem fountain via Flickr under Creative Comms license under Creative-Commons license audio icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

The Bisexuality Report

According to a new report written by Open University academics, bisexuals endure worse mental health problems and suffer from an equality gap.

Audio
5 mins
The psychology of cloning Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Used with permission article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

The psychology of cloning

Richard Stevens, senior lecturer (previously head) of the Department of Psychology at The Open University, considers cloning from the psychological perspective

Article
Does Inside Out accurately capture the mind of an 11-year-old girl? A child psychologist weighs in Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Tanyaru | Dreamstime.com - White Eggs With Different Emotions In Tray Horizontal Photo article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Does Inside Out accurately capture the mind of an 11-year-old girl? A child psychologist weighs in

Is it enough to use Joy, Sadness, Fear, Disgust and Anger to portray a pre-pubescent child's behaviour?

Article

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Making Faces

Open University cognitive psychologist Graham Pike describes how his interest in facial compositing has led to a collaboration resulting in a computer based tool, called Efit V. This tool might transform the process of identifying police suspects. It is being developed to allow law enforcement agencies to produce images of criminal suspects at very short notice at crime scenes revolutionising the process of identification. To find out more, follow the research links.

Video
5 mins
The coloursound experiment: What is synaesthesia? Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: Jupiterimages article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

The coloursound experiment: What is synaesthesia?

The Breaking Science team discussed the latest thinking about an unusual condition

Article
Same and different Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: The Open University video icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Same and different

This example of how young children view mass and volume shows some of the ways in which our research is carried out and our ideas about child development

Video
5 mins
Buzan on memory and shopping Copyrighted image Icon Copyright: photos.com article icon

Health, Sports & Psychology 

Buzan on memory and shopping

Tony Buzan explores memory and shopping - and sharpening one to help with the other.

Article