What are the differences between individual and minority rights? How did the League of Nations and United Nations attempt to address the topic of human rights? Right now, we define human rights as the rights to which all people are inherently entitled to as a result of being a human being. From the creation of the League of Nations in 1920 it’s been accepted that everyone should be protected under a set of natural or legal laws, but how has the definition of these rights changed since they were first conceived? This audio collection examines the role the League of Nations and United Nations played in the implementation of this idea and both the pros and cons of assigning rights to individuals and to groups.
This material forms part of the Open University course ‘A327 Europe 1914-1989 War, Peace Modernity’
Track 1: End of the League of Nations
Chris Williams and Stewart Mitchell discuss the end of the league of nations
Mark Mazower author of Dark Continent discusses the benefits of collective rights/ highlights potential issues with Individual rights.
Play now
The problem with Individual rights
Very informative, I enjoyed listening to the content of each recording. My only gripe is that the audio is not one continous tape. I think it would be better, if it was one audio file with natural breaks between each topic. In the same way podcasts or audio books have a natural break between chapters.
Rate and Review
Rate this audio
Review this audio
Log into OpenLearn to leave reviews and join in the conversation.
Audio reviews