Legal skills and debates in Scotland
Legal skills and debates in Scotland

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

1.3  Analysing the argument

When you evaluate, for example, academic materials, policy underlying legislation, court judgments, you should aim to understand and form a judgement on the validity of the arguments that are presented. You can do this by looking at the coherence of the argument, the supporting evidence and the conclusion reached.

Activity 2 Analysing arguments

Timing: (Allow 5 minutes)

Look at the following statements and consider whether they conform to the definition of an argument provided in Section 1.1. What do you think of the validity of the arguments?

  • a.‘The earth is round, as is demonstrated by the boat disappearing over the horizon.’
  • b.‘The explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 proves that all nuclear power stations are dangerous and should be closed down.’
  • c.‘The common law system based on judgments in real cases provides both a detailed and pragmatic system that cannot be matched by the more theoretical codes of the civil law system.’
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).


  • a.This statement argues that the earth is round and provides logical evidence for that claim; namely, it explains why the boat disappears over the horizon. This is now a verifiable fact rather than an argument.
  • b.This statement is an argument in the sense that its premise is that nuclear power stations are dangerous. The statement provides evidence for this by referring to the explosion in 1986 of the Chernobyl nuclear power station. The conclusion that all nuclear power stations should be closed down has been made by making the assumption that the explosion at Chernobyl proves that all nuclear power stations are dangerous. The accuracy of this assumption would need to be explored.
  • c.In this statement the premise is that the common law system is more detailed and pragmatic than the civil law system. Limited evidence to back up this premise is provided – namely, that the common law system is based on judgments in real cases rather than being based on theoretical principles.

Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module, or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification. Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information.

Not ready for formal University study? Then browse over 1000 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus371