Seventeenth-century Dutch painting stands out from other art of the same period and even more so from that of previous centuries on account of its apparently ‘everyday’ character. Works by artists such as Johannes Vermeer, Pieter de Hooch and Jacob van Ruisdael seem to offer a faithful picture of life in the Netherlands at the time. In studying this free course, Dutch painting of the Golden Age, you will discover that there is much more to Dutch painting than meets the eye. You will explore scholarly debates about the possible meanings that might be attributed to this type of picture and learn how the very idea of ‘realism’ in art has been challenged in recent times.
Course learning outcomes
After studying this course, you should be able to:
explore recent debates around the interpretation of seventeenth-century Dutch painting
consider the strengths and limitations of iconology as an art-historical approach
examine the notion of 'realism' as applied to works of art
address the relevance of social and cultural context for interpreting works of art
analyse works of art in terms of different ideas and approaches.
I learned a great deal from this course so I gave it 4 stars. But it would have deserved 5 stars if it did not have 3 major drawbacks. First there was too much scholarly attribution in the course - I did not need to hear what one 17th century scholar thought and how a 19th century scholar argued about it. Instead I would have preferred to have the theories plainly stated and let me make up my own mind. Second the course illustrated too many minor Dutch painters. Instead it should have focused on the main ones of the golden age, these being: Hals, Leyster, Rembrandt, Ruisdael and Vermeer (although the last had a couple of paintings on the last page). I would also have preferred a grand overview of Dutch painters that would include Bosch, Breughel the Elder, and Eyck. And the third drawback: If you want to study the paintings illustrated in this course you have to go on a search of the internet to find clear, detailed renditions. I don't understand how a college level course got away with using such blurry, muddy versions of the paintings!