References

Criminal Procedure Rules, Part 19, Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 and Criminal Practice Directions 2023 - GOV.UK

ISO 21043-5:2025 - Forensic sciences — Part 5: Reporting

Kukucka, J., Kassin, S.M., Zapf, P.A., & Dror, I.E. (2017). Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6(4), pp 452-459,https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.jarmac.2017.09.001.

Leonetti, C. (2024). Ensuring the reliability of evidence in the New Zealand criminal courts: The admissibility of forensic science. Common Law World Review, 53(4), 197-222. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 14737795241237799(Original work published 2024)

Morgan, J. (2023). Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 68(3), pp 908-961https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ 1556-4029.15233

Morrison, G.S., Bali, A.S., Martire, K.A., Grady, R.H., & Thompson, W.C. (2025). What is the best way to present likelihood ratios? A review of past research and recommendations for future research, Science & Justice, 65(6),https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.scijus.2025.101342.

Roberts, P. (2009). The science of proof: Forensic science evidence in English criminal trials. pp 446-485. In Fraser, J., & Williams, R. (Eds.). Handbook of Forensic Science (1st ed.). Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843927327