1 What do you think?
Activity 1 What would you do?
You’ve now seen all of the evidence in Dave’s case. From the police investigation, the traces gathered from the scene and elsewhere, the data resulting from the scientific examination of those traces, the evaluation of that data within the context of the alleged activities and what happens in the courtroom. You have been provided with the evidence that has been recovered and now needs to be considered in order to attempt to deliver justice for this case.
- Based on that evidence, what would you do?
- Do you think there is enough evidence to take the case to trial?
- If it did go to trial and you were sitting on the jury, based on the evidence, would you acquit or convict?
Answer
In reality, there was not sufficient evidence to meet the CPS threshold for the prosecution to further the case, so the case was dropped.
Prosecutors must be satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction against each suspect on each charge. They must consider what the defence case may be, and how it is likely to affect the prospects of conviction. A case which does not pass the evidential stage must not proceed, no matter how serious or sensitive it may be. This means that no one was convicted. Reflect on how this makes you feel. This illustrates a real challenge faced by the justice system.