References

Armstrong, A.J., Holmes, C.M. and Henning, D. (2020) ‘A Changing world, again: How Appreciative Inquiry can guide our growth’, Social Sciences and HumanitiesOpen, 2, 100038.

Boud, D. and Hager, P. (2012) ‘Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practices’, Studies in Continuing Education, 34(1), pp. 17–30.

Bushe, G.R. (2007) ‘AI is not (just) about the positive’, O.D. Practitioner, 39(4), pp. 30–35.

Bushe, G.R. (2013) ‘Generative process, generative outcome: the transformational potential of appreciative inquiry’, Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, 4, pp. 89–113.

Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D. and Stavors, J.M. (2008) The Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: for leaders of change, 2nd edition, Brunswick: Crown Custom Publishing; San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Dewey, J. (1933) How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co Publishers.

Education Scotland ‘Research and Enquiry’. Available at: https://professionallearning.education.gov.scot/ explore/ research/ [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] (Accessed: 2 September 2022).

Gallagher, S. and Lindgren, R. (2015) ‘Enactive metaphors: learning through full-body engagement’, Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), pp. 391–404.

Ghaye, T. et al. (2008) ‘Participatory and appreciative action and reflection (PAAR) – democratizing reflective practices’, Reflective Practice, 9(4), pp. 361–397.

GTCS ‘Professional Learning’. Available at: https://www.gtcs.org.uk/ professional-update/ professional-learning/ (Accessed: 2 September 2022).

OpenLearn (2021) ‘Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in STEM’. Available at: https://www.open.edu/ openlearn/ science-maths-technology/ scholarship-teaching-and-learning-stem/ content-section-overview?active-tab=description-tab (Accessed: 2 September 2022).

Scott, J.T. and Armstrong, A.C. (2019) ‘Disrupting the deficit discourse: reframing metaphors for professional learning in the context of appreciative inquiry’, Professional Development in Education, 45(1), pp. 114–124.

Wall, K., Beck, A. and Scott, N. (2020). The nature and purpose of practitioner enquiry. Available at: www.strath.ac.uk/ humanities/ schoolofeducation/ blog/ thenatureandpurposeofpractitionerenquiry/ (Accessed: 15 January 2022).

Wall, K. and Hall, E. (2017) ‘The teacher in teacher-practitioner research: three principles of inquiry’, in Boyd, A. and Szplit,, P. (ed) Teachers and teacher educators learning through inquiry. Kraków: Attyka, pp. 35–62.

Zandee, D.P. (2013) ‘The process of generative inquiry’, Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, 4, pp. 69–88.