Skip to content
Skip to main content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Improving patient, family and colleague witnesses’ experiences of Fitness to Practise proceedings
Improving patient, family and colleague witnesses’ experiences of Fitness to Practise proceedings

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

2 Why don’t people raise a concern, and why does this matter?

So far, you’ve learned about some of the reasons the public expresses concern to regulators. You will now read our findings on why some people are unwilling to report concerns and the repercussions of not raising issues with health and social care regulators.

A sign saying ‘stop doing what doesn’t work’

Activity: reflection point

Timing: Allow 10 minutes

Watch the animation below and decide whether you agree with the reasons people gave for raising or not raising a concern.

If you’d like to, make some notes in the text box below. Your notes will only be visible to you.

Download this video clip.Video player: witness_to_harm_-_video_1_v4.mp4
Copy this transcript to the clipboard
Print this transcript
Show transcript | Hide transcript
 
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Discussion

This study revealed a number of reasons why people are willing to and reluctant to express concerns; some people believe that raising a concern will have no impact. Some people try to handle their concerns locally with the organisation rather than filing a formal concern with regulators under the Fitness to Practise procedure, as there are several ways people can raise a concern.

When some people wish to lodge concerns with regulators, the complex process deters them, and they may feel it’s a challenge when they are already distressed by practitioners’ conduct. One thing for sure is that to make people comfortable raising concerns, information needs to be easily available and accessible. 

Given that the majority of UK citizens look for information online and that the majority of information is available there, research participants believed that how information is presented online is critical; too much information can overwhelm individuals, and too little will not provide them with enough information to make informed decisions. 

Activity: reflection point

Timing: Allow 5 minutes

Reflect on the following question and make some notes in the text box below:

  • If you needed to raise a concern with a regulator and found that there is a limit on the number of words you can write or that you cannot upload existing documents, would you still fill out the form and submit it? Note down the reasons why you responded in this way.
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Discussion

We discovered that restrictions like this could discourage people from voicing concerns. Similarly, they become irritated and lose interest if they are given difficult and jargonistic material. We identified that most of the online information linked to the Fitness to Practice of 13 regulators is inaccessible to those with limited literacy skills. If the public does not express concerns to regulators, changing poor practice in health and social care will be impossible.

We also found that some people do not want to speak up about issues that are difficult to prove due to the poor practice, itself having an isolating effect:

The quote reads: ‘… one of the things that was said in the hearing was around why you didn’t speak up at the time. Yes absolutely. Because I knew, it’s one of those things where you feel trapped, you know what’s happened but you’re too embarrassed to even mention it, yeah. And I think that what he’d done was so difficult to prove and so shocking, I thought well why don’t I just not talk about that and talk about the things that can be proved …’