6 Recommendations from the research
Our recommendations for improving public trust in forensic science are grounded in the evidence of a strong link between public trust and the willingness of individuals to share information and materials of forensic relevance with investigative authorities. While diverse backgrounds and criminal justice interactions and experiences pose different barriers to trust and cooperating with investigators, several issues consistently emerge across both the general public and members of seldom-heard communities. Key among these is a limited understanding of what authorities will do with the information provided and the purposes for which it will be used. Addressing these concerns through tailored education that reflects the circumstances and realities of the communities involved presents a clear opportunity to strengthen trust and enhance public cooperation with forensic and investigative processes.
To achieve this, we recommend the following:
|
In this week you have seen some research findings and how they relate to different perceptions of trust in forensic science. We have also explored some of the drivers of trust and distrust and the impact they can have in the CJS. Next time you’re reading about a crime where there is forensic evidence, think about why or why not you trust it.
This downloadable document has handy references on how forensic science evidence is used in a criminal investigation and trial.
Crime to court booklet [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)]
In this course we explored the role and importance of trust and distrust in forensic science evidence in a criminal investigation. The course took you from the crime scene to the court, examining how police and CSIs collected, analysed, and used the evidence in Dave’s fictional case. It also looked more broadly at when it can and cannot be used in an investigation.
Research on trust in forensic science evidence was provided. Data was shared from three groups: the public, people who work in the CJS and those whose opinions are seldom heards. Recommendations for increasing trust-where appropriate- was provided along with better understandings as to why the forensic science might not be trusted.
We hope you enjoyed the course.
