Mastering systems thinking in practice
Mastering systems thinking in practice

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

Free course

Mastering systems thinking in practice

5.1 Simple (purposive) and complex (purposeful) systems

Spend a few minutes reading through the table and then do the activity that follows.

Table 1 Characteristics ascribed to situations regarded as simple (purposive) and complex (purposeful) systems

Situations regarded as simple ‘purposive systems’Situations regarded as complex ‘purposeful systems’
Have predictable behaviour; e.g. a fixed interest bank account. Generate counterintuitive, seemingly acausal behaviour that is full of surprises; e.g. lower taxes and interest rates leading to higher unemployment.
Few interactions and feedback or feed forward loops; e.g. a simple barter economy with few goods and services.A large array of variables with many interactions, lags, feedback loops and feed forward loops, which create the possibility that new, self-organising behaviours will emerge: e.g. most large organisations, life itself.
Centralised decision-making; e.g. power is concentrated among a few decision makers.Decentralised decision-making – because power is more diffuse, the numerous components generate the actual system behaviour.
Are decomposable because of weak interactions; i.e. it is possible to look at components without losing properties of the whole.Are irreducible – neglecting any part of the process or severing any of the connections linking its parts usually destroys essential aspects of the system behaviour or structure. There are dynamic changes in the system and the environment.
(Adapted from Casti, 1994, pp. 271–3)

Activity 3 Reflections on categorisations

Timing: Allow approximately 15 minutes for this activity.

In the original version of Table 1, Casti ascribed the terms simple and complex to the word systems. Write down your answers to the following questions:

  1. In what ways do you experience the terms ‘systems’ and ‘complex’ being used by Casti?
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).
  1. What implications might these categories have for systems practice?
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).
  1. How does the revision of the two categories alter in any way, if at all, your understandings of the terms ‘complexity’ and ‘systems’?
To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Comment

The purpose of this activity was to invite you to reflect on what it is that we do when we categorise anything. One way of reading this table is as a set of two categories each containing different category members. The mechanism employed in this categorisation is to add an adjective in front of the noun ‘system’. So they are different categories of system. This is the same process as developing a typology. Of course this is something we do all the time but I do not think we reflect very often on the implications of doing this! The implications for systems practice are discussed next.

The questions in Activity 3 are extremely interesting but at the same time potentially confusing. The word ‘complex’ is being used by Casti in some cases to mean the same as ‘system’, and some of the characteristics of complexity seem to be applied to system. The phrase ‘complex system’ is common, although the meaning attributed to it is often unclear. For example, it might be unclear whether Casti is using ‘system’ in its everyday sense or in the specific way it is used within the study of systems to mean a system of interest to someone.

When you consider the examples used in Table 1 there is something qualitatively different about a simple barter economy and the phenomenon of lower taxes and interest rates leading to higher unemployment other than whether they can be described as simple or complex. Indeed, you might question whether it would be helpful to consider a barter economy as simple. Considering the quality of relationships and trust that might be necessary to sustain a barter economy, it could be perceived as complex. This notion of quality of relationship is an important additional distinction that could be attributed to complexity over that provided in the earlier list of Schoderbeck et al. (1985) in Week 2 which tends to focus only on the quantity of variables or interactions.

Skip Your course resources
MSTP_1

Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module, or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification. Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information.

Not ready for formal University study? Then browse over 1000 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus371