Skip to content
Skip to main content

The sharing economy

Updated Wednesday, 12 September 2018

How sharing and caring is the sharing economy? Petr Jehlička takes a critical look at the booming sector and traces its hidden connections and contradictions.

This page was published over 1 year ago. Please be aware that due to the passage of time, the information provided on this page may be out of date or otherwise inaccurate, and any views or opinions expressed may no longer be relevant. Some technical elements such as audio-visual and interactive media may no longer work. For more detail, see how we deal with older content.

Recent headline figures for the sharing economy flagship company Airbnb are that in early 2016 there were 640,000 Airbnb hosts, 2 million listings and 60 million users worldwide. In Paris, the number of Airbnb listings increased 220 times from 2009 to 2015. Several digital platform-based sharing economy companies such as Uber (taxi service), Bla Bla Car (ride sharing) and Ofo (bicycle sharing) have experienced a similar exponential rise in the number of users and popularity.

The following video clip featuring Professor Arun Sundararajan (New York University) captures the excitement of the proponents of the sharing economy concerning its potential for growth and disruption of the mainstream economy.

Webby Connect Interview: Arun Sundararajan on The Sharing Economy


While Arun Sundararajan views the sharing economy in an unequivocally positive light, as an opportunity to increase efficiency of the market economy, grow production, increase consumption and as a benefit to the less well-off, Janelle Orsi of the Sustainable Economies Law Center in California takes a more critical view of the digital platform-based sharing economy. To find out what Orsi identifies as the two key design flaws of this model of economy, watch the next cartoon up to 5:20 (we’ll watch and analyse the rest later):

The Next Sharing Economy: Now Featuring More Sharing!


Criticism of the sharing economy

As you have seen, in her cartoon Orsi relates the proliferation of the sharing economy to major global trends and problems, such as growing social inequality and climate change. This mounting critique of the sharing economy is partly borne out of the frustration that activists, academics and many other citizens feel when they look back at the early 2000s’ euphoria about the capacity of the sharing economy as the ‘third perspective on capitalism and consumerism’ (Heinrichs 2013) to minimise resource use, disrupt mainstream economy, erode consumerism and foster social cohesion (Hamari et al. 2015).

At the time, the nascent sharing economy with digital intermediary platforms to handle logistics was about timesharing power tools, cars and other similar things on a non-profit basis. The idea was to make a more effective, cheaper and environmentally beneficial use of these tools rather than owning them and leaving them idle much of the time. This changed once for-profit companies took control of intermediary digital platforms. The prominent commentator on technology and society Evgeny Morozov called the outcome of this transformation ‘neoliberalism on steroids’ (Morozov 2013, cited in Richardson 2015).

Regaining the sharing economy

While the first part of Orsi’s cartoon shows how the ownership structure of companies in today’s sharing economy undermine social and environmental goals they might once have had, the second part of the cartoon discusses how the new economic model of the sharing economy could be transformed to restore its social and environmental benefits.

In today’s sharing economy, dominated by its representation as the market and platform based commercial transactions, Lizzie Richardson’s (2015) article is a timely reminder that the emergence of the sharing economy has been framed as a confluence of the mobilisation of sharing within the cyber (sub)cultures and within diverse economies. The latter is a concept coined by J. K. Gibson-Graham (2008) and refers to a range of economic forms outside the mainstream economy, including alternative markets (ethical fair trade markets, barter, local trading systems and alternative currencies) and non-market economies (household flows, gift giving and exchanges, gleaning and gathering). It was these alternative market and non-market transactions, enhanced and mediated by digital platforms that were seen as drivers towards those social and environmental benefits mentioned at the outset.

The subversion of broader social and environmental transformations associated with the earlier variant of the sharing economy by the narrow focus on profit maximisation points to the need to consider the mutualisation of existing platform-based businesses as proposed by Janelle Orsi. But we also need to take a further step back and revisit the forms of peer to peer sharing that thrived – and still thrive – outside the market. These economic forms are not motivated by profit and may not even require digital intermediations.

Further reading and references

Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) ‘Diverse economies: performative practices for other worlds’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 613 - 632.

Hamari, J., Sjöklint M. and Ukkonen, A. (2015) ‘The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,  (Accessed 26 March 2018).

Heinrichs, H. (2013) ‘Sharing economy: A potential new pathway to sustainability’ Gaia, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 228 - 231.

Richardson, L. (2015) ‘Performing the sharing economy’, Geoforum, vol. 67, pp. 121 - 129.

Non-market, non-monetised forms of economy and market-based cooperatives, and other economic alternatives that extend their aims beyond profit are discussed extensively in several Open University modules.

As the module title suggests, sharing in a broad sense is a central concept in DST206 Environment: Sharing a Dynamic Planet. More specifically, non-market sharing and other forms of informal and diverse economies in the food system are explored in Block 5: Food, most prominently in Chapter 7 Beyond the ABC model: from biotechnology to ‘grow your own’ by Petr Jehlička. (There is an unexpected close link between Arun Sundararajan’s clip and this chapter. They both refer to keeping chickens for eggs production in one’s backyard. However, while for Sundararajan renting chickens for a couple of months is meant to test the viability of commercial egg production, the chapter explores this activity as a strictly non-market form of economy.) The concept of sharing is revisited in Block 6 Consolidation by Nick Bingham. Cooperatives and responsible consumption (discussed in Janelle Orsi’s cartoon) are explored in Block 5, Chapter 8 Growth markets? Market-based alternatives, certification and ethical consumption by Wendy Maples.

In DU311: Earth in Crisis: Environmental Policy in an International Context, Chapter 4 Look North: environmental responses in consumer democracies - the case of the European Union by Petr Jehlička considers sharing, barter and gifts and informal food production in relation to responsible and sustainable consumption.



Become an OU student


Ratings & Comments

Share this free course

Copyright information

Skip Rate and Review

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Have a question?