- The Open University
- Guest user / Sign out
- Study with The Open University
- The Open University
- Guest user / Sign out
- Study with The Open University
My OpenLearn Profile
Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite content and get recognition for your learning
I feel helpess nevertheless, when a country can claim sovereignty while another can be occupied brcause self-deterrmination is opposed, thus human rights breaches happen on a daily, hourly basis.
It is useful to try to understand international relations within a human rights context, and, as has been indicated there are positive examples of 'justice' being exacted eg at the ICC. Nevertheless if countries can (a) claim to be sovereign and (b) act independently within that claimed, and then established sovereignty its difficult to see how there can be a univesal response to breaches of human rights.
I think the Nuremberg trials following The Holocaust, which first brought the terms genocide and crimes against humanity to international notice helped to fix a wider notion of global interrnational human rights. There are nevertheless, so many ways in which states can avoid intervention with mere censure.
I think political power and where it lies determines how international law is applied or ignored.
Great to be studying again on the OU
Thank you
Dave Clinch
Taddiport
Torrington
Devon