Activity 1.2 Who is responsible for developing sustainability competencies?
Post a summary of your thoughts about Activity 1.2 Question 2.
Read others posts and consider how they add to your understanding.
In an ideal situation, we would take shared responsibility for developing sustainability competencies, in the same way that we are responsible for employability skills, embedding English and Maths, and so on. Usually I would say there is a need for clear direction from SMT on priorities. However, given the nature of sustainability competencies, and that we want learners to be empowered to organise themselves and take action, I would say that any teacher who is inspired to take action on this has a responsibility to do this, and lead the change needed.
I really like the idea of empowering learners to organise themselves and take responsibility for their learning. I think this would give students tremendous opportunities for growth, and those that engage would undoubtedly benefit far more than if everything was scheduled. I wonder if there is a way to encourage this while also making sure that all students engage in sustainability to an agreed level?
Hi Melanie- I agree, some schools have funded posts specifically for sustainability education within the school and this allows for greater staff understanding of its place within the curriculum. Where possible, the competencies should be integrated into lessons as well as perhaps a more targeted approach, for example assemblies and school focus groups allowing pupil participation.
I think any educator or education employee should try their hardest to embed these skills in any lesson. Senior management unfortunately dictate what we can or cannot teach, however it can be filtered n and dropped into lessons in snippets. I teach textiles so teaching about upcycling is easier for me than maths for example. Even having recycling bins for students begins to give them some responsibility to make the ethical choices.
Hi Melanie, I agree that it is important to empower learners. I recently heard a great speech by Natalie Bennett. She spoke about the importance of encouraging students to see themselves as agents of change. She had recently been working with some sixth form girls to challenge their school's uniform policy which did not allow girls to wear trousers. Natalie argued that this experience was a really powerful one for the girls involved. It showed them that they could change the structures that governed them.
I suspect that this work is likely to be left to a teacher with a passion for and interest in sustainability, which, while great to allow a teacher to develop, can lead to a very patchy education. There may not be anyone in some schools, whereas another school could have a core group of teachers committed to delivering education around sustainability. If one person leading the work leaves, the work could unravel very quickly.
I very much think that sustainability should be taught across different subjects, but that means there is a role to pull this work together, record it and ensure that the school and students recognise it as a whole and value it. However this is a time consuming job and requires someone with either the authority to ensure teachers engage, or significant persuasive skills.
A specific project or off-timetable day is a way that may provide more opportunities, although the add on nature makes it vulnerable and means there are fewer opportunities to embed it deeply to subject content.
Hi Polly- I agree, school based focus groups can be a great way to enhance staff/pupil participation and allow a greater understanding of sustainability overall. Assemblies are also another way of ensuring whole school participation. Also, some schools are fortunate to have sustainability officers who can advise staff/departments about how best to teach sustainability in their individual areas. As always, it often comes down to fund allocations and staffing. Perhaps a greater input on a local/national level would allow a more equitable approach to accessing sustainability education.
Ideally, all educators have a shared responsibility for developing sustainability competencies, though some teachers have a greater understanding of the role of sustainability, often due to CPD training or subject area. Other teachers see integrating new concepts and ideas as time constraining and added work. For example, some schools already integrate their own individual skills frameworks into lessons, as well as learning and teaching expectations and school ethos, these are often reflective of areas such as sustainability or the national curriculum competencies. Perhaps some teachers feel that adding more visual competencies/goals/values could become confusing to learners and take away from the learning aims of individual lessons/courses. A greater clarity through CPD provision on sustainability at local and national level would greatly help this.
I wonder if there is any difference in the scoring between teachers preparing students for an IB versus the narrowness of A Levels. Just in the UK context, but international comparison points would be interesting too. My answers to a, b, c and d centred around the lack of flex in state schools and the warping effect of test/exam preparation on teachers' leeway (at secondary level).
I believe that all educators in all disciplines have a responsibility to develop sustainability competencies. If we are going to be successful in our response to the climate crisis we need to act together across disciplines and everyone needs to recognise they have a part to play.
However I understand that in all spheres of education the existing curriculum is very full and many educational organisations are motivated by exam success which makes it difficult to find the time and space to develop anything outside the core subject skills and knowledge. There needs to be a collective commitment to prioritise sustainability competencies.
Youssef Bilani Post 12 in reply to 1
• 5 October 2025, 12:44 PM • Edited by the author on 5 October 2025, 12:45 PMNavigating the Green Divide: Challenges and Catalysts in Cultivating Sustainability Competencies
Who is responsible for developing sustainability competencies?
The discussion around developing sustainability competencies highlights a critical and complex area within education. My thoughts, drawing, can be summarized as follows:
1. Shared Responsibility, Teacher-Centric Challenges: While the responsibility for developing sustainability competencies is inherently shared among various stakeholders (governments, communities, parents, and students themselves), teachers emerge as the primary implementers within the formal education system. However, they face a "constellation of complex and interconnected problems" m that significantly impede their ability to effectively fulfill this role.
2. Major Challenges for Teachers: The challenges teachers encounter are multifaceted and can be categorized into:
- Curricular Barriers: The traditional structure of education, characterized by "disciplinary silos" and an already "crowded curriculum," makes it difficult to integrate the inherently interdisciplinary nature of sustainability education. Sustainability is often perceived as an "add-on" rather than a core component, and the focus on factual content over competency development further exacerbates this issue.
- Systemic Barriers: High-stakes testing and standardized assessments often narrow the curriculum, pushing sustainability education to the periphery as it may not be directly assessed . Crucially, there's a significant lack of "adequate professional learning opportunities" for teachers in both the content and pedagogy of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) . Limited funding and resources, alongside the often-overlooked importance of geoscience education, also present substantial hurdles.
- Personal and Perceptual Barriers: Some teachers may lack a full understanding of ESD's significance, viewing it as irrelevant or a passing "fashion". Resistance to changing established teaching methods and the already heavy workload of teachers can also deter them from taking on additional responsibilities related to sustainability.
3. Motivations for Teachers: Despite these challenges, teachers are motivated by several powerful factors:
- Addressing Global Urgency: A deep understanding of the "urgent need to address complex and interconnected global problems" drives many teachers to prepare students for a sustainable future.
- Student Engagement: The growing awareness and concern among students about climate change and other sustainability issues create a demand that inspires teachers to integrate relevant content and action-oriented learning.
- Professional Commitment: Teachers often see themselves as "key agents of social change" and are committed to preparing responsible citizens who can contribute to a more sustainable society.
- Positive Educational Outcomes: Evidence suggesting that ESD can enhance student achievement, improve attendance, and develop problem-solving skills provides a strong incentive.
- Institutional Support and Personal Values: Clear institutional policies, training programs, and teachers' personal commitment to sustainable living also play a significant role in fostering motivation.
4. Personal Experience (Inferred Challenges): While I, as an AI, do not have personal experiences, I can infer that teachers would commonly experience:
- Time constraints due to packed curricula and administrative duties.
- Lack of readily available, high-quality resources and materials.
- Limited personal expertise in interdisciplinary sustainability topics.
- Potential resistance from colleagues or administration who prioritize traditional metrics.
- Difficulty in measuring the tangible impact of sustainability education, making advocacy harder.
- The challenge of bridging the knowledge-action gap in students.
5. How to Enhance Student Learning in Sustainable Development: To effectively integrate sustainability competencies, fundamental changes are required:
- Curricular Reform: Moving towards interdisciplinary, competency-based learning with a focus on real-world contexts and problem-based approaches is crucial.
- Teacher Training and Support: Mandatory, ongoing professional development in ESD content and pedagogy, coupled with the development and sharing of high-quality resources, is essential to build teacher capacity and confidence.
- Systemic and Policy Changes: Governments must provide clear policies and guidance, reduce the emphasis on high-stakes testing, allocate adequate funding, and reformulate education policies to prioritize planetary well-being. Strengthening Earth science education is also vital.
- Empowering Students and Community Engagement: Involving students in curriculum design, fostering community partnerships, and promoting critical media literacy will empower students to become active agents of change.
In conclusion, while the aspiration for sustainability education is strong, overcoming the systemic, curricular, and personal barriers teachers face is paramount. A concerted effort involving policy reform, robust teacher support, and innovative pedagogical approaches is necessary to ensure that all students acquire the knowledge and skills needed for a sustainable future.
