In the eighteenth century and into the early part of the nineteenth, considerable numbers of aristocratic men (and occasionally women) travelled across Europe in pursuit of education, social advancement and entertainment, on what was known as the Grand Tour. A central objective was to gain exposure to the cultures of classical antiquity, particularly in Italy. In this free course, youโll explore some of the different kinds of cultural encounters that fed into the Grand Tour, and will explore the role that they play in our study of Art History, English Literature, Creative Writing and Classical Studies today.
This OpenLearn course is an adapted extract from the Open University course A112 Cultures.
Course learning outcomes
After studying this course, you should be able to:
understand some of the key characteristics of the Grand Tour as a cultural practice in eighteenth and nineteenth century Europe
appreciate why the ancient world was so significant for modern visitors of this era
analyse a range of different texts and images, both ancient and modern
reflect how how these texts and images can prompt new creative activity, and put this into practice.
The course met its stated introductory level learning outcomes admirably, by focusing on a small number of key components of the Grand Tour. However, one cannot help feeling that it would have benefitted from greater historical, rather than artistic detail. For example, who were the "Thomas Cooks" of the Grand Tour, perhaps Thomas Coryat (1611) or, far more likely, Thomas Howard, 14th Earl of Arundel (1613-1614)?
Miscellaneous points:
The MS Word document figures have double โView descriptionโ links to the same description.
The reference section was surprisingly limited.
The included images are often, but not always, of a low resolution and require replacement from the web site itself.
2.2 The Grand Tour portrait: places and objects
๐ฆ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ-๐ง๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ
"income from which was around ยฃ24,000 a year"
Given the lack of references, confirming this figure proved problematic.
Page 356 of The Gentleman's magazine v.75 pt.1 1805:
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027527087&seq=356&q1=24,000&start=1
After stating the very substantial settlements within his will (totalling ยฃ310,000), "The net produce of his landed property is about ยฃ24,000 per annum" appears. Thus, ยฃ24,000 / year is the figure at death (after substantial sales of the inheritance from his uncle in south east London, which had been associated with the ยฃ24,000 figure within the course text), rather than when he was 20 (at the time of his Grand Tour).
2.3 The Grand Tour portrait: people and professions
๐๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐น ๐ช๐ถ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ฎ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฒ
"Gordon is shown as an active figure, wearing the uniform of the 105th Regiment of Foot and grasping the sword he used as a threat to quash a revolt in the Houses of Parliament in 1780."
1) He was appointed a lieutenant-colonel of the 105th Regiment of Foot on 11 October 1762, though the regiment was promptly disbanded in 1763. The painting of him in that uniform in 1765-1766 seems to be somewhat unexpected; admittedly, he was retained at half-salary.
2) Perhaps the text should emphasise that the 1780 revolt was referring to the infamous Gordon Riots, provoked by his nephew Lord George Gordon (also an MP), who asked if the mob could enter Parliament.
2.4 The Grand Tour portrait: couples
๐ ๐ฟ & ๐ ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐น๐ฝ๐ต ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ (๐๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐)
Regarding the benefit of incorporating further historical information, the MFABoston, produced a commentary. It was self-evident that the Izards were slave owners, the likely link to Michelle Obama's forefathers is surely a fascinating one, even if only included as a reference?
https://www.mfa.org/entry/2016/mr-and-mrs-ralph-izard-alice-delancey
โ
Three interesting quotations from an authoritative portfolio may be of interest:
๐๐๐น๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฃ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐, ๐๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ต๐ป ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐น๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐'๐ "๐ ๐ฟ. ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ ๐ฟ๐. ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐น๐ฝ๐ต ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ", Maurie D. McInnis https://www.jstor.org/stable/1215344
1) "Even at the time when the Izards and Copley encountered the sculptural group, its identification was disputed. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ and is ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ถ๐."
2) '"...sitting at a table, she having just copyed on paper these statues, & is shewing it to her husband, who (judging from his countinance) is evidently going to give her his candid opinion of her sketch." If the sketch is by Alice Izard, then the painting might illustrate the gender differences in eighteenth-century education, whereby women were more often taught only to draw and paint as necessary accomplishments, while ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ผ ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ, ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฝ ๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด.'
3) "Another scholar has suggested that the drawing is not intended to be the work of Alice Izard but is, instead, another of the Izard's purchases and that it is in the manner of Batoni. Whether the sketch is by Alice Izard or a professional copyist, the central theme of the portrait remains Ralph Izard in the act of contemplation."
Miscellaneous points:
The MS Word document figures have double โView descriptionโ links to the same description.
The reference section was surprisingly limited.
The included images are often, but not always, of a low resolution and require replacement from the web site itself.
2.2 The Grand Tour portrait: places and objects
๐ฆ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ-๐ง๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ
"income from which was around ยฃ24,000 a year"
Given the lack of references, confirming this figure proved problematic.
Page 356 of The Gentleman's magazine v.75 pt.1 1805:
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027527087&seq=356&q1=24,000&start=1
After stating the very substantial settlements within his will (totalling ยฃ310,000), "The net produce of his landed property is about ยฃ24,000 per annum" appears. Thus, ยฃ24,000 / year is the figure at death (after substantial sales of the inheritance from his uncle in south east London, which had been associated with the ยฃ24,000 figure within the course text), rather than when he was 20 (at the time of his Grand Tour).
2.3 The Grand Tour portrait: people and professions
๐๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐น ๐ช๐ถ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ฎ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฒ
"Gordon is shown as an active figure, wearing the uniform of the 105th Regiment of Foot and grasping the sword he used as a threat to quash a revolt in the Houses of Parliament in 1780."
1) He was appointed a lieutenant-colonel of the 105th Regiment of Foot on 11 October 1762, though the regiment was promptly disbanded in 1763. The painting of him in that uniform in 1765-1766 seems to be somewhat unexpected; admittedly, he was retained at half-salary.
2) Perhaps the text should emphasise that the 1780 revolt was referring to the infamous Gordon Riots, provoked by his nephew Lord George Gordon (also an MP), who asked if the mob could enter Parliament.
2.4 The Grand Tour portrait: couples
๐ ๐ฟ & ๐ ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐น๐ฝ๐ต ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ (๐๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐)
Regarding the benefit of incorporating further historical information, the MFABoston, produced a commentary. It was self-evident that the Izards were slave owners, the likely link to Michelle Obama's forefathers is surely a fascinating one, even if only included as a reference?
https://www.mfa.org/entry/2016/mr-and-mrs-ralph-izard-alice-delancey
โ
Three interesting quotations from an authoritative portfolio may be of interest:
๐๐๐น๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฃ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐, ๐๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ต๐ป ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐น๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐'๐ "๐ ๐ฟ. ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ ๐ฟ๐. ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐น๐ฝ๐ต ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ", Maurie D. McInnis https://www.jstor.org/stable/1215344
1) "Even at the time when the Izards and Copley encountered the sculptural group, its identification was disputed. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ and is ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ถ๐."
2) '"...sitting at a table, she having just copyed on paper these statues, & is shewing it to her husband, who (judging from his countinance) is evidently going to give her his candid opinion of her sketch." If the sketch is by Alice Izard, then the painting might illustrate the gender differences in eighteenth-century education, whereby women were more often taught only to draw and paint as necessary accomplishments, while ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ผ ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ผ๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ผ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ, ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฝ ๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด.'
3) "Another scholar has suggested that the drawing is not intended to be the work of Alice Izard but is, instead, another of the Izard's purchases and that it is in the manner of Batoni. Whether the sketch is by Alice Izard or a professional copyist, the central theme of the portrait remains Ralph Izard in the act of contemplation."