Skip to content
Skip to main content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Exploring the history of prisoner education
Exploring the history of prisoner education

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

4 The rise of imprisonment

From about 1760, efforts were made across the British Isles to reform prisons. The most famous reformer was John Howard. In 1773 Howard was appointed High Sheriff of Bedfordshire which gave him control over the county gaol. He was appalled by the conditions he found there. His demands for reform led him to travel the length and breadth of the United Kingdom creating a catalogue of prisons, with details of the conditions he found in each. His catalogue, published as The State of the Prisons in 1777, became a model for the next generation of penal reformers and, later, for prison inspection.

This black and white illustration depicts a well-dressed man standing to the right of centre, in a dark, stone-flagged interior. He gestures to the left, where a group of men, women and children cluster around a sack-covered figure reclining on a stone bench. They gaze towards the visitor in apparent despair.
Figure 6 John Howard visiting an English prison. Originally drawn in the late 1700s by Francis Wheatley. Note the squalor of the prison, the lack of separation between men and women, and the presence of children, imprisoned with their mothers.

Howard’s work was extremely influential and informed a raft of legislation which encouraged local authorities to reform their prisons. Between 1780 and 1799, around 60 prisons were built or substantially rebuilt in England and Wales. When Howard visited Ireland, he noted some attempts were already being made at prison reform. In 1786, Ireland witnessed the appointment of the first government-salaried prison inspector in the Western world. Jeremiah Fitzpatrick was an energetic man and has often been called ‘the second Howard’. Through his efforts, many Irish prisons were built or reformed (Butler, 2016, p. 727).

As well as efforts to reform prisons, the use of imprisonment as a punishment underwent a significant transformation. In the 1700s, sentences of imprisonment were used relatively infrequently and typically only for very minor offences. In law, most crimes were punishable by whipping, branding or death by hanging. Although many crimes were officially punishable by death, the death penalty was used sparingly. It was meant to provide an example to deter others. Many of those sentenced to death were pardoned or had their sentences commuted to transportation, a form of exile, first to America and later to Australia.

At the end of the 1700s, more people accused of crime were being brought before the courts, and more of those who were accused were being convicted. This suggested to contemporaries that crime was increasing, though it is hard to tell from the available evidence whether this was true. The threat of execution, it seemed, was not deterring crime. This was compounded by the fact that, because it was not desirable to hang large numbers of people, the chance of being executed if capitally convicted was decreasing. By 1815, 90% of those condemned to death were either pardoned or transported (Gatrell, 1994, p. 21).

This led to calls for the reform of punishment and especially the greater use of sentences of imprisonment which were considered both proportionate (matching the gravity of the offence) and certain (prisoners would go to prison, rather than being pardoned). In 1816, the first penitentiary run by central government was opened at Millbank, London. This prison was for men and women, convicted of crimes punishable by death or transportation, who were selected to serve long sentences of imprisonment instead.

Activity 2 Mapping the prison system in England and Wales during the 1800s

Timing: Allow approximately 10 minutes for this activity

The replacement of bodily or physical punishments – such as death, transportation, and whipping (among others) – with imprisonment led to the rise of new types of prisons in the early 1800s.

The penal system in all four nations became a complex web of institutions through which men, women and children flowed depending on the seriousness of the crime of which they were accused and, if convicted, the punishment given. Until 1877, local prisons were managed by local authorities and convict prisons were managed by central government.

Have a look at the diagram below which maps the prison system for England and Wales in the 1800s. It’s quite detailed, because it was a complicated system! Don’t worry, you don’t need to remember everything, but the detail should enable you to identify three important points which are essential knowledge for this course. To help, here are three questions – have a go at answering them using the diagram.

  1. The prison system comprised two sectors – the local and the convict. Local prisons accommodated remand prisoners (those awaiting trial) and those sentenced to imprisonment. Convict prisons held those convicted of serious offences and sentenced to transportation or (later) penal servitude (a long prison sentence which was served in stages). Can you identify the other crucial difference between local and convict prisons?
  2. Although they held prisoners with different sentences, there was a relationship between the local and convict prison sectors. Can you briefly explain what that was?
  3. The prison system was not static, but continued to evolve as punishments changed and new types of prison appeared. Can you identify any broad trends?

Click on the following link to access the diagram: Prison system in England and Wales [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] .

Click on the individual entries (for instance, ‘Lock-up’) to be taken to a more detailed account of that entry. Then click on ‘Return to map’.

To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Discussion

  1. The other crucial difference between local prisons and convict prisons was the time that prisoners spent in them. Sentences of imprisonment served in local prisons never exceeded two years and most were under three months. Many prisoners were sentenced to just one week. Remand prisoners were rarely held for more than a few months. Prisoners sent to convict prisons before being transported to Australia spent months or sometimes years confined in them. Those who were not transported, or who were sentenced to penal servitude, spent more than two years in convict prisons (including long stretches at individual institutions). The difference is an important one, because learning – and by implication, rehabilitation – takes time. Short sentences limited the effectiveness of prison education.
  2. All prisoners who ended up in the convict sector first spent time in local prisons waiting for their trial. It is worth noting too, that while local prisons typically accommodated those accused or convicted of crimes committed in the local area (broadly speaking), convict prisons, typically located in London and on the south coast, took prisoners from all over England and Wales. Transfer to the convict sector often took prisoners far away from family and friends.
  3. Over the course of the 1800s the number of different types of prisons decreased. In the early 1800s, there were many different types of prisons, each of which purported to perform a specialist function in the prison system – for example, gaols for remand prisoners, prison hulks (decommissioned war ships fitted up as prisons) for ‘invalids’ (i.e. men considered too weak to undergo transportation to Australia), Pentonville for ‘promising men’ (i.e. those who showed signs they could be reformed). As the century progressed, the differences between prisons were eroded and the system was streamlined. In 1850, Millbank and Pentonville became prisons for all convicts serving their first stage of punishment in separate confinement. Hulks (in England) disappeared in the late 1850s. The juvenile prison was abolished in 1864. In 1865, all gaols and houses of correction became local prisons. By the 1880s, there were no longer probationary and public works prisons for men, just convict prisons, which often accommodated men in both stages. In the convict sector, the only remaining difference at the end of the century was between male and female prisons.