2.5.2 What are the similarities and differences? (2)
Activity 14 Part 2
Task 2
Complete the text boxes below by typing in your answers for both Text 4 and Text 5.
Question 1a
Who is the author?
Text 4
Answer
An academic (Feltham, C.).
Question 1b
Text 5
Answer
An academic (Open University).
Comment
Both texts are university texts and academic in nature, so they could be written by academics or teachers.
Question 2a
What is their purpose in writing?
Text 4
Answer
To promote anthropathology.
Question 2b
Text 5
Answer
To introduce some important aspects of evolution.
Comment
The writer of Text 4 seems to promote anthropathology as a possible new discipline and the writer of Text 5 seems to introduce some important aspects of the science of evolution.
Question 3a
What type of text is it?
Text 4
Answer
An extract from an academic book.
Question 3b
Text 5
Answer
A textbook or an extract from course material.
Question 4a
Where would you find it?
Text 4
Answer
In the full book, whether that’s online or in printed form. Or a book extract could possibly be found elsewhere as a standalone article.
Question 4b
Text 5
Answer
In a textbook or course material.
Comment
Both texts seem to be in the style of short articles. Text 4 is an extract from a book. Text 5 introduces basic ideas about evolution, which makes it more likely to be from a textbook or course material.
Question 5a
What subject area is the text from?
Text 4
Answer
Anthropathology.
Question 5b
Text 5
Answer
Science (of evolution).
Comment
You would probably recognise Text 5 as coming from the subject area of science if you already know that the subject of evolution is studied in science. The text also refers to the science of evolution in the opening line. Text 4 is, as it claims, from the new discipline of anthropathology. This probably connects with other subject areas such as anthropology, biology and social sciences.
Task 3
Think about the following questions and write down some ideas.
Question 1
Which of the two texts is more pessimistic? Why?
Answer
Text 4 is more pessimistic in that it is very gloomy about the human race. Text 5 ends with an optimistic view of the possible future of humankind.
Question 2
Which of the two texts is based on accepted fact and which is based on beliefs you might challenge?
Answer
Text 5 is probably based on a more widely accepted fact – the science of evolution – than Text 4. Perhaps many more people would challenge the view of human nature in Text 4.
Comment
Establishing what is ‘fact’ is not as easy as it might seem. Even well accepted facts can turn out to be opinions. It was once thought that the Earth is flat; Galileo was imprisoned for suggesting this was not a fact. Once you start questioning texts, more ‘facts’ may turn out to be opinions. However, it is usually possible to tell that some texts are more fact-based than others.