Skip to content
Skip to main content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Exploring the history of prisoner education
Exploring the history of prisoner education

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

3 Ways of educating

Education within the prison took a variety of forms. In some prisons, like Preston House of Correction, prisoners were given books – primers, spelling books, and grammars – and writing implements – pens and paper or pencils and slates – and told to instruct each other. While some chaplains found prisoners were uninterested, other chaplains were impressed with how they got on. The governor at Louth House of Correction declared in 1837, ‘[the prisoners] instruct themselves as well as they can, and it is quite wonderful to see in this way the improvement they make’ (Inspectors, Northern & Eastern, 3rd Report, 1837–38, p. 52).

In this black and white drawing, a woman wearing a long dress and bonnet sits on the left with a book on her knee. Alongside her sit seven women, some of them occupied with sewing. On the right and in the foreground are a group of men and boys, leaning intently forward.
Figure 5 Sarah Martin, visiting the prisoners at Great Yarmouth Borough Gaol. In this picture, Sarah Martin is reading to men and women as some of them work. She also taught prisoners how to read and write.

More often, some kind of teacher was appointed to instruct the prisoners. Sometimes a literate prisoner who had behaved well filled the role. Other times, the authorities benefited from the visits of a charitable lady or gentleman who took it upon themselves to teach the prisoners to read and write. One of the most famous prison visitors was Sarah Martin who, between 1818 and 1843, taught the prisoners at Great Yarmouth Borough Gaol to read and write (Rogers, 2009).

Family members of prison officers were also asked to teach. At Ely Gaol in 1849, the governor’s daughter, aged 11, taught the female prisoners. Prison officers – warders, matrons, and even chaplains – sometimes stepped in to provide instruction. At some prisons, paid schoolmasters, or, less often, paid schoolmistresses, were employed to teach the prisoners (Crone, 2022, ch.1).

Officials, then, drew on a range of available resources in order to teach prisoners to read and write. However, as you shall see, those arrangements which appeared to offer the least disruption to the penal environment – such as prisoners teaching each other – or required minimal financial outlay – the use of prisoner-schoolmasters, charitable visitors, or family members – soon proved to be the most problematic for the authorities.

Activity 2 Silence and separation

Timing: Allow approximately 5 minutes for this activity
This is a drawing of a narrow cell with a curved ceiling and a high window in the rear wall. A narrow bed is slung between the walls in the foreground. A loom behind it fills the bulk of the space. A basin and some printed documents are mounted on the cell walls.
Figure 6 A separate cell at Pentonville Prison. The cells were large enough to enable prisoners to work in them during the day. This one is fitted with a handloom. Others had hand cranks. The cells also had running water, their own toilet facilities and heating, which was highly advanced at the time, but which also meant that there was little need for the prisoner to leave his cell. The sole purpose of the window was to supply natural light. It was deliberately high so that prisoners had no way of seeing out into the world.

In the Introduction to this session, you watched a short video on the rise of silence and separation, two competing forms of prison discipline that appeared in the mid-1830s. Take another look at any notes you made. Considering the various ways in which prisoners were taught to read and write, what impact do you think the imposition of silence or separation might have had on prison education?

To use this interactive functionality a free OU account is required. Sign in or register.
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Discussion

Under the silent system, although prisoners remained in association, any form of communication between them – verbal, written or physical – was strictly prohibited. Under the separate system, prisoners were locked in solitary cells as much as possible, and were also forbidden to communicate when brought into association for exercise or chapel services.

These rules on contact between prisoners meant that forms of mutual instruction or peer learning were abolished. Prisoners were also no longer able to be appointed as teachers. In some prisons, in consequence of the imposition of silence or separation, prisoners were left without instruction for some time until new arrangements could be made.

At the same time, education in prisons became more important under both the silent and separate systems. The ability to read provided mental relief for prisoners, and could protect at least some from depression and mental illness. Separation in theory relied on prisoners being able to read the Bible, and to understand its messages of Christian salvation, especially when the visits of the chaplain were necessarily short and few and far between.