Skip to content
Skip to main content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Exploring the history of prisoner education
Exploring the history of prisoner education

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

2 The persistence of prison education

Despite the new focus on punishment in prisons, schools for prisoners persisted. The provision of education was included in the new rules for local prisons laid out in the 1865 Prison Act. The Convict Prison Directors issued new Standing Orders on education in convict prisons – some of which you will learn about shortly – signalling their commitment to some degree of provision. Given the significant disillusionment with reformatory projects in prisons, where did this commitment to education come from?

Although there was significant appetite among policymakers to punish, it should be remembered that they did not (or could not) entirely abandon the reformatory aim of imprisonment. As historian Lawrence Goldman has explained, the reformation of offenders was expedient, as a penal system that reformed prisoners was cheaper than one that did not because it tackled reoffending (Goldman, 2002, p. 147). Prisons, in a democratic society and funded by taxation, need to maintain public support. The continuation of education, as well as the curtailed religious facilities, showed that something was being done to ensure that prisoners did not leave prison worse than when they came in.

For another equally, if not more plausible explanation for the persistence of education in prisons, we need to look outside the penal world. In Session 1 you learned that the desire for a national system of schooling in England – and the failure to establish one – played a key role in the initial establishment of schools in prisons during the 1810s and 1820s.

In the foreground of this black and white photograph, three boys lie on a gym mat underneath a high-bar frame, studying something in front of them. Several long desks are arranged behind them, with boys sitting on benches at either side. A schoolmaster stands to the right of centre, looking towards the camera.
Figure 2 Boys at lessons in the gymnasium at the Leeds Reformatory School for Boys, which opened in 1857 (n.d.). The 1854 Youthful Offenders Act enabled magistrates and justices to sentence criminally convicted boys and girls up to the age of sixteen to a period of between 2 and 5 years in a reformatory school certified by the government. The legislation also required that at least two weeks were spent in prison prior to transfer. Far from removing the education project from prisons, the legislation arguably further entrenched the idea that the ‘criminal class’ were in need of schooling.

Between c.1850 and 1862, educational reform was once again on the government’s agenda. During the 1850s, a consensus emerged among policymakers that some degree of national education provision was needed for England and Wales. Several attempts were made to legislate for universal elementary schooling. In 1853, a new grant was introduced for inspected schools based on the number of children in attendance.

Between 1854 and 1857, the government took responsibility for the education of criminal and potentially criminal children through the establishment of reformatory and industrial schools. In 1858, a Royal Commission was convened to consider the question of national provision. The Revised Code of 1862, which made grants to inspected schools dependent on the regular attendance of pupils and their performance in examinations in reading, writing and arithmetic, was intended both to reduce costs and to encourage more working-class parents – who were primarily interested in basic skills teaching – to send their children to school.

These developments, especially in the absence of a national system of schooling, ensured the survival of schools in prisons. Educational policy, as you will see in this and the next session, continued to have some impact on provision in prisons, as penal policymakers and officials attempted to mirror the teaching that was on offer in state-subsidised elementary schools. Penal policy, however, continued to shape the delivery of education.