References

Bond, C. F., Jr. and DePaulo, B. M. (2006) ‘Accuracy of deception judgments’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), pp. 214–34.

Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D. and Hunsaker. F. G. (1991) ‘1. Interpersonal deception’ ‘11: The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors’, Communication Monographs, 58, pp. 25–40.

Levine, T. R., Park, H. S. and McCornack, S. A. (1999) ‘Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: documenting the “veracity effect”’, Communication Monographs, 66, pp. 125–44.

Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E. and Antón, C. (2005) ‘Generalised communicative suspicion (GCS) among police officers: Accounting for the investigator bias effect’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(5), pp. 1046–1066.

Shaw, D. J., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. A. and Fisher, R. P. (2013) ‘Expect the unexpected? Variations in question type elicit cues to deception in interviewer contexts’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, pp. 336–43.

Vrij, A. and Mann, S. (2001) ‘Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real-life high-stake lies’, Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, pp. 119–32.

Alison, E. and Alison, L. (2020) Rapport: The Four Ways to Read People, Random House.

Alison, L., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S. and Christiansen, P. (2013) ‘Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists’, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, pp. 411–31.

Bernieri F. and Gillis J. (2001) ‘Judging rapport: employing Brunswik’s lens model to study interpersonal insensitivity’, in Hall, J. A. and Bernieri, F. J. (eds) Interpersonal Sensitivity: Theory and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 67–88.

Birtchnell, J. (2014) ‘The interpersonal circle and the interpersonal octagon: A confluence of ideas’, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21, pp. 62–72.

Bull, R. (2013) ‘What is believed or actually known about characteristics that may contribute to being a good/effective interviewer’, Investigative Interviewing Research and Practice, 5(2), pp. 128–43.

College of Policing (2023) ‘Investigative interviewing’, College of Policing Authorised Professional Practice. Available at: https://www.college.police.uk/ app/ investigation/ investigative-interviewing (Accessed: 27 July 2023).

Holmberg, U. and Christianson, S. A. (2002) ‘Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes‘, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20(1–2), pp. 31–45.

Leary, T. (1957) Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Ronald.

Connecticut General Assembly (no date) Interrogation Techniques. Available at: https://www.cga.ct.gov/ 2014/ rpt/ 2014-R-0071.htm (Accessed: 16 August 2023).

Gudjonsson, G. (2003) The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998) ‘Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises’, Review of General Psychology, 2, pp. 175–220.

Starr, D. (2013) ‘Do police interrogation techniques produce false confessions?’, The New Yorker. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/ magazine/ 2013/ 12/ 09/ the-interview-7 (Accessed: 16 August 2023).

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases’, Science, 185, pp. 1124–1131.

Walsh, D., O’Callaghan, S. and Milne, R. (2016) ‘Questioning the interrogational practices of US law-enforcement officers: Legal and psychological perspectives’, in Kapardis, A. and Farrington, D. P. (eds) The Psychology of Crime Policing and Courts, London: Routledge.

West, E. and Meterko, V. (2015) ‘Innocence project: DNA exonerations, 1989–2014: review of data and findings from the first 25 years‘, Albany Law Review, 79(3), pp. 717–95.

Alison, E. and Alison, L. (2020) Rapport: The Four Ways to Read People, Penguin.

Alison, L., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S. and Christiansen, P. (2013) ‘Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists’, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, pp. 411–31.