Skip to main content

About this free course

Share this free course

Anti-racist coaching practice for youth sport
Anti-racist coaching practice for youth sport

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol on the course to track your learning.

4 Adapting practice to meet different cultural needs

In Session 1 you were introduced to a number of terms related to anti-racism, one of which included the notion of non-racism. To re-cap, non-racism refers to the position that many people take that focuses mainly on ensuring they are not undertaking behaviours or practices that might be seen to be discriminatory or racist. In contrast, an anti-racist approach seeks to take pro-active steps to create more inclusive environments and directly challenge practices and systems that can lead to discriminatory outcomes based around ideas of race and one’s ethnic background.

In sport environments, adopting a non-racist position can often inform the view that coaches and those in other support roles must treat everyone the same, because differential treatment of individuals may lead to accusations of discrimination (or discriminatory outcomes). Colour-blindness is a term that has been used to characterise this type of position, whereby seeking to treat everyone the same can ignore or downplay both the dominance of one particular set of cultural norms (that some may find easier to conform to or be part of than others) and the racial inequalities that exist in wider social life (Bonilla-Silva, 2021).

This also chimes with the different ways that people understand how social inequalities should be tackled, either through equality of treatment or through equity – a term used to describe the importance of recognising the different needs and barriers that individuals and groups of people face in life. Crucially, such differences and barriers tend to be the product of historical processes of inequality (such as the Atlantic slave trade and European colonialism from several hundred years ago) and contemporary systems (e.g. institutional racism) rather than being caused by the individual themselves. Figure 2 offers a useful illustration of the difference between conceptions of equality and equity.

Figure 2 The contrasts between equality and equity

A core pillar of anti-racist practice is to recognise that:

  • people have different needs and barriers that can lead to exclusion
  • this requires the adaptation of practice to ensure diverse needs can be met – so that people can feel equally included, welcomed and able to thrive.

Watch the video below where Asad and Sully both discuss some of the ways they adapt their practice and expectations to meet the various needs of their players.

Download this video clip.Video player: arc_1_s2v3.mp4
Show transcript | Hide transcript
 
Interactive feature not available in single page view (see it in standard view).

Some further examples of adapting a coach’s practice to meet the needs of an ethnically diverse group of players include the following:

  1. Ensuring that all players can take authorised time out from their sport so that they are able to fully observe religious festivals.
  2. Being flexible around clothing and equipment requirements to ensure all cultural norms around dress are respected.
  3. Taking a flexible approach to time-keeping and considering when to run sessions so that they do not automatically exclude some people.
  4. Checking your player’s understanding of language and your adapting instructions/communication as needed.
  5. Learning and then being sensitive to cultural norms around body language/touch (such as eye contact and handshakes) and expectations around social hierarchies.

The next section encourages you take some time to reflect on your learning across this session.