Unit 1: Introduction

View

1.7 The safeguarding cycle

When managing safeguarding in a programme or project, aid workers have a lot to think about.

Most organisational policies tend to only talk about ‘top lines’ regarding organisational commitments, leaving those working in the field to interpret these commitments into realistic actions to ensure programmes are safe.

To help learners with how to implement organisational policies in their work, this course has mapped the journey by way of a ‘safeguarding cycle’.

Video

View transcript

Watch the video above, and as you do, think about what you would include in the different components of the phases of the cycle.

You will note that the ‘safeguarding cycle’ follows a similar template to the ‘project management cycle’ (PMC), which many of us working in development or humanitarian sectors may already be familiar with.

PMC is a project management approach that addresses the complexities of a project through all its phases while maintaining alignment with the strategy and objectives agreed upon by stakeholders (for example, donors, partners, the community) at the outset.

PMC helps structure and determine the phases of the project, as well as how to approach tasks in those phases. Using the PMC approach, we hope that this will help you better understand how to incorporate safeguarding principles into the work that you do during your projects and activities.

We explore more of this later in the course. We will also explore how to implement the various safeguarding principles, standards and tools against this backdrop.


The safeguarding journey

An illustration of a person standing on a directional arrow that resembles a pathway leading straight ahead to the horizon. To either side of the directional pathway are other directional arrows all pointing in different directions.

People working in or representing organisations possess power and influence over others for a variety of reasons: their gender, race, role/position in the organisation, employment status, nationality, language and education.

Most of those who are in leadership positions, for example, make decisions on who receives jobs, services and resources, and could misuse this power for their own advantage or gain.

People with less power are usually those who are already vulnerable, either because of personal circumstances such as age, ethnicity, disability, role/position, employment status, nationality (or lack of), language and education, as well as possibly external circumstances such as displacement, armed conflict, or lack of opportunities to have their voices heard or trusted.

Keeping people safe when working with vulnerable communities can be seen as a journey. It takes attitudinal and behavioural changes, and that’s not easy to do, especially if we as aid workers have greater power than others that we work with. This is why safeguarding is seen as an organisational journey and using standards and tools will support our work to be safer for the communities that we serve and support, as well as ensuring they are viewed and treated as partners in this endeavour.


Further reading

The Safeguarding Journey: An Introduction to Safeguarding Resource & Support Hub (RSH)