The standard view of this forum does not always work well with
assistive technology. We also provide a simpler view, which still contains all features. Switch to simple view.
Already Registered?
Free Statement of Participation on completion of these courses.

If you create an account, you can set up a personal learning profile on the site.
As mentioned in some comment below, one of the main obstacles for publishing is the current academic rewarding system, in which scientists are evaluated based on their publications in high-profile journals or those that have high impact factors.
Increasingly, more people talk about the importance, not only of the scientists academic impact of their publications but also the importance of the non-academic impact, that is, evaluate scientists/articles based on the social, health, cultural, environmental or economic impact of their publications.
Does anyone know if this is also being incorporated or is it in line with Open Access policies?
I don't know the answer to your question but I'd be interested to find out! Working in public engagement, there is a real focus on pathways to impact and how we can demonstrate non-academic impact...although this seems increasingly difficult to demonstrate/evaluate. It certainly has the potential to change/influence the reward system...
For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.
If you have any concerns about anything on this site please get in contact with us here.