Unit 3: Prevention

View

3.2 Safeguarding people with disabilities

In this section we look at the importance of safeguarding children and adults with disabilities and explore the importance of including them and their carers when developing safeguarding measures to prevent harm.

Promoting disability-inclusive safeguarding guidelines

View transcript

Watch the video above by Able Child Africa on promoting disability-inclusive safeguarding guidelines. This may provide you with some ideas for the activities that follow.


How to prevent harm to people with disabilities

An image of a disabled, teenage girl in a wheelchair.

People with disabilities also have a right to be protected from harm as well as a right to participate, and organisations who have contact with them must ensure this.

It is widely recognised that this group is more at risk from abuse and exploitation, so we must identify this risk and prevent harm from occurring.

Activity 3.3 Why are people with disabilities even more at risk?

(Allow 15 minutes)

The table below has a list of some of the reasons why people with disabilities are even more at risk of sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment. For each reason try and think of one or more mitigating measures that would prevent harm from occurring and write your responses in the second column. If you are aware of additional reasons, you can add them below.

People with disabilities – blank template

Here is a writable version of the template shown below. You can type into this PDF form and then save it and/or print it.

People with disabilities (PwD) – blank template. There are two columns and six rows. The first column header is What are the risks to people with disabilities (PwD)? The second column header is Organisational mitigation measures to prevent harm. Column two is blank. In row one, under column one, is PwD are more likely to live in poverty and so need to engage with aid organisations. Organisations that work with people with disabilities may be targeted by perpetrators precisely because they are less likely to speak up or be understood. The second row is People with disabilities are seen as ‘less valuable’ in society and so they are marginalised and less cared for. The third row is It may be more difficult for PwD to speak up due to communication limitations or having different ways of communicating. Row four is Overcoming the resistance of people with disabilities who may be less able to defend themselves from abuse. Row five is Lack of access to information about safeguarding because they are not included or the information not accessible in a format that they understand. Row six is PwDs are more reliant on others for personal care.

The table below has some suggestions of mitigation actions – you may have been able to think of many other strategies for mitigation. Here is a PDF version of this table

Mitigation actions – some model suggestions. The table has two columns and six rows. The first column header is What are the issues? The second column header is Mitigation actions. In row one, under column one, is PwD are more likely to live in poverty and so need to engage with aid organisations. Organisations that work with people with disabilities may be targeted by perpetrators precisely because they are less likely to speak up or be understood. Under column two is Organisations must have robust recruitment procedures to prevent potential perpetrators from working with them. Organisations require greater vigilance and supervision of staff and volunteers. Staff need awareness of the way some perpetrators operate, particularly since they may target and groom PwD. The second row is People with disabilities are seen as ‘less valuable’ in society and so they are marginalised and less cared for. Under column two is Staff should be trained in safeguarding and on the rights of PwD to be able to challenge discriminatory views which exacerbate harm. Organisations should develop projects that have an inclusive ethos and a commitment to rights. The third row is It may be more difficult for PwD to speak up due to communication limitations or having different ways of communicating. Under column two is Need to identify signs of abuse better, rather than relying wholly on disclosure. Enhancing staff communication skills e.g., sign language.  Row four is Overcoming the resistance of people with disabilities who may be less able to defend themselves from abuse. Under column two is Promote educational rights and educational programmes that always include provision for disabled children. Row five is Lack of access to information about safeguarding because they are not included or the information not accessible in a format that they understand. Under column two is Organisations should ensure PwD are included in any formulating safeguarding information and that such information is made accessible to them. Row six is PwDs are more reliant on others for personal care. Under column two is Organisations require greater vigilance and supervision of staff and volunteers.

If you want to learn more about safeguarding and disability, follow the links below.


Case study – people with sight and hearing difficulties

Sense International is an international NGO working with people with sight and hearing difficulties.

Their work includes early identification of children who need support, helping the development of suitable school and home-based education, and offering vocational training. As well as campaigning for change, Sense International also works to strengthen local organisations and groups to support people with ‘deafblindness’ a combination of vision and hearing impairments, also described as multi-sensory impairment (MSI).

In Kenya, Sense International received a grant to implement a three-year disability inclusion project entitled Learning for all: inclusive education for learners with complex disabilities with the aim of improving developmental outcomes for children with complex disabilities in two rural counties.

The organisation has a full range of safeguarding procedures and policies in place, but because of their work with this particular group of beneficiaries they have had to consider how to promote them to make them meaningful and enhance prevention.

To do this they have used social media, local radio stations and accessible safeguarding awareness materials. They have also developed a video for parents of children with complex disabilities to help them try to create a safe environment for when their children have contact with agency workers.

View transcript

Activity 3.4 Creating a more secure environment

Watch the video above.

Think about how your organisation could learn to be more inclusive in safeguarding and record your response in your learning journal.

View comment


Promoting safeguarding with caregivers

Having watched the video in the previous section, you will have learnt that Sense International in Kenya communicated the importance of safeguarding to parents of children with sensory difficulties to help create a protective environment.

They did this by uploading a safeguarding video onto Android tablets. The parents from each county were trained on how to use the Android devices, how to access the video, the importance of the video and how to take care of the devices. They were encouraged to watch at home together with their children with complex disabilities and other family members.

The agency opted to use video technology rather than more traditional ways such as print because:

  • Parents and others can watch the video at their own pace and in a more relaxed environment at home.
  • They are easily accessible to all parents, most of whom have low literacy levels.
  • Others in the family can also watch them, thus ensuring a child with complex disabilities receives care from all members of the family.
  • It is more cost effective and environmentally friendly compared to printed materials.

In addition, telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of 12 parents to try to evaluate whether or not the information about safeguarding had been understood. It is important to try and evaluate whether our strategies are proving successful.


Safeguarding with disabled children and adults

View transcript

Activity 3.5 The safeguarding work of Sense International

Watch the video above in which Muthami Mutie, the safeguarding focal point for Sense International Kenya, talks about the safeguarding work of this agency.

As you watch, note in your journal what your organisation could learn from these examples of practice.

View comment


Prevention checklist

Able Child Africa has devised a tool to challenge shifting attitudes and practices when working with children with disabilities.

This ‘prevention checklist’ could be used to audit your organisational safeguarding policies and procedures in order to promote more disability-inclusive child safeguarding.

Activity 3.6 Prevention checklist

(Allow 15 minutes)

Review the checklist below and discuss with others in your organisation how you might use this tool to review policy and practice.

Prevention checklist - 1. Have you conducted a disability-inclusive, child-safeguarding risk assessment that takes into consideration the specific risks related to children with disabilities? 2. Have you developed a clear system or procedure that is followed to make sure activities delivered are safe for children with disabilities, with steps taken before, during and after to mitigate risks and ensure the equal participation of children with disabilities? 3. Have you consulted with children with disabilities and performed additional checks to identify and remove environmental barriers to ensure that physical spaces are safe? 4. Have you identified and prepared for any financial risks to the programme implementation? 4.1 Have you built in any costs for risk mitigation? 4.2 Have you built in any costs for awareness-raising, reporting, and responding? 4.3 Is it possible to make revisions to existing budgets to facilitate any adjustments needed to make programmes safe for children with disabilities? 5. Have you planned for and developed a mitigation strategy in case of a medical emergency during programme delivery, particularly recognising that children with disabilities may have complex health requirements that put them at greater risk? 6. Do you seek informed consent/assent from all children, including children with disabilities, before engaging them or collecting their information, taking photos and videos? 6.1 Are staff aware of the risks to cause harm to children with disabilities, such as shame, hurt and offence if their information is shared in a way that they have not given informed consent/assent to? 6.2 Are there protocols in place to ensure that children are not portrayed in compromising situations (for example, sad, weak, vulnerable, etc.) and only in positive ways that show their agency and individualism? 7. Are staff aware that some children with disabilities can be more easily identifiable and recognised than children without disabilities because their specific disability (or assistive technology they come with) can be an identifiable characteristic?

(© Source: Able Child Africa Toolkit)

View comment