Note: you may not have access to these articles unless you have a University library account.

Akkerman, S.F. and Bakker, A. (2011) ‘Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects’, Review of Educational Research, 81(2), pp. 132–169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435.

Arias, E. et al. (2000) ‘Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), pp. 84–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345015.

Barrett, M. and Oborn, E. (2010) ‘Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams’, Human Relations, 63(8), pp. 1199–1221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709355657.

Bruner, J. (1996) The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Bradford. MIT.

Carlile, P.R. (2002) ‘A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development’, Organization Science, 13(4), pp. 442–455. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.

Carmichael, P. (2012) ‘Tribes, Territories and Threshold Concepts: Educational materialisms at work in higher education’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(sup1), pp. 31–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00743.x.

Cousin, G. (2006) ‘An introduction to threshold concepts’, Planet, 17(1), pp. 4–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2006.00170004.

Definition of LIMINAL (no date). Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liminal (Accessed: 3 June 2022).

Fischer, G. (2004) ‘Social creativity: turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design’, in Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - PDC 04. the eighth conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM Press, p. 152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011889.

Fischer, G. et al. (2005) ‘Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), pp. 482–512. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014.

Kynigos, C. and Daskolia, M. (2021) ‘Boundary Crossing Creativity in the Design of Digital Resources for Teaching and Learning about Climate Change’, Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 8(1), pp. 213–235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0013.

Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002) ‘The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), pp. 167–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.

Matsumoto, Y., Kasamatsu, H. and Sakakibara, M. (2022) ‘Challenges in Forming Transdisciplinary Communities of Practice for Solving Environmental Problems in Developing Countries’, World Futures, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.2012878.

McGreavy, B. et al. (2013) ‘Addressing the complexities of boundary work in sustainability science through communication’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(10), pp. 4195–4221. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5104195.

Meyer, J. and Land, R. (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Citeseer.

Meyer, J. and Land, R. (2006) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. 0 edn. Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966273.

Nicolescu, B. (2014) ‘Methodology of Transdisciplinarity’, World Futures, 70(3–4), pp. 186–199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631.

Pearce, B.B.J. et al. (2022) ‘Going beyond the AHA! moment: insight discovery for transdisciplinary research and learning’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01129-0.

Perkins, D. (1999) ‘The many faces of constructivism.’, Educational leadership, 57(3), pp. 6–11.

Savin-Baden, M. (2016) ‘The impact of transdisciplinary threshold concepts on student engagement in problem-based learning: A conceptual synthesis’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 10(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1588.

Star, S.L. (1989) ‘The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving’, in Distributed artificial intelligence. Elsevier, pp. 37–54.

Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) ‘Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39’, Social Studies of Science, 19(3), pp. 387–420. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.

Suchman, L. (1993) ‘Working relations of technology production and use’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(1), pp. 21–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00749282.

Wertsch, J.V. and Toma, C. (1995) Discourse and learning in the classroom: a sociocultural approach. in l. P. steffe & J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 159-174). Hillsdale, nJ: lawrence erlbaum.