Individual artists have been the traditional focus of art history, but how do we evaluate the figure of the artist? This free course, Artists and authorship: the case of Raphael, takes the life of Raphael as a case study. You will examine sixteenth-century sources to explore the creation of artistic authorship in the early modern era. The course explores past and current approaches to the artist in terms of authorship, identity and subjectivity. You will consider issues such as the relationship between the artist's life and work, the enduring notion of 'genius' and the artist as a source of meaning.
Course learning outcomes
After studying this course, you should be able to:
understand how both primary and secondary sources need to be read critically to identify and evaluate arguments and approaches
understand and evaluate biography as a form of writing with its own traditions and conventions
demonstrate a critical awareness of differing approaches to art history
comprehend and engage with a range of ideas about selfhood and subjectivity.
Overall, this was most certainly a highly rewarding experience; the course succeeds within its intended scope. The activities were particularly useful in developing the reader's understanding of the subject. Personally, the course should perhaps have contained a third section, which could have extended the bibliographical foundations into a broader interpretive framework encompassing further examples from the artist’s oeuvre.
Also, whilst there are references to Raphael's 'workshop' (in direct contrast to its absence in respect of Michelangelo), Raphael’s authorship surely requires engaging with the workshop as a creative system:
- Centralised design control (Raphael as chief designer)
- Distributed execution (assistants handling drapery, backgrounds, architecture)
- Quality‑control bottlenecks (Raphael’s finishing touches)
- Standardised stylistic templates (cartoons, modelli, pattern books)
- Specialised labour divisions (Penni for colour, Giulio for dynamism, etc.)
- Brand consistency (everything still “looked like Raphael”)
Also, whilst there are references to Raphael's 'workshop' (in direct contrast to its absence in respect of Michelangelo), Raphael’s authorship surely requires engaging with the workshop as a creative system:
- Centralised design control (Raphael as chief designer)
- Distributed execution (assistants handling drapery, backgrounds, architecture)
- Quality‑control bottlenecks (Raphael’s finishing touches)
- Standardised stylistic templates (cartoons, modelli, pattern books)
- Specialised labour divisions (Penni for colour, Giulio for dynamism, etc.)
- Brand consistency (everything still “looked like Raphael”)
Onward to Goya...