Skip to main content

About this free course

Download this course

Share this free course

Environment: treading lightly on the Earth
Environment: treading lightly on the Earth

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

4.3 Lighter living costs and constraints

Of course, the costs of ‘light living’ actions also need to be considered. Some actions involve no cost or save money – for example, less flying, shopping or meat eating – or can even make money, such as letting out a spare room. Others are low cost with a rapid payback time. For example, replacing a halogen light bulb with a low-energy compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) or light emitting diode (LED) lamp should pay back the new lamp’s cost in lower electricity bills in a year. Other measures may involve extra cost, for example taking the train instead of driving, or considerable investment, such as installing a rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) system, which may take ten years or more to pay back. The big carbon-reduction benefits of such actions have to be weighed against affordability, cost and return – although some people may consider that the economics are less important than the carbon reductions.

Apart from cost, there are many other factors that may attract or deter people from acting. Travel behaviour is well known as one of the most difficult things to change. For example, there may be little choice for some people about using a car for commuting, shopping or ferrying children about. Looking forward to that foreign holiday may be the one thing that keeps someone going.

As noted in Section 2, needs, wants and social values are important too. For example, some people feel that travelling by bicycle or bus is only for people who can’t afford a car, and that flying to exotic destinations gives them social status. On the other hand, others get satisfaction in the idea of cutting their travel footprint in half, or making their home really ‘green’.

Most people’s lifestyles are only partly under their control or are what is considered ‘normal’ by society. So freedom to change can be constrained by circumstances and the expectations of wider society. Even so, it’s important not to fall into the trap of thinking that only making changes with minor environmental benefits is enough. As the former government chief scientific advisor, Professor David McKay, observed, ‘If everyone does a little, we’ll achieve only a little’ (McKay, 2008, p. 3).