Environment: understanding atmospheric and ocean flows
Environment: understanding atmospheric and ocean flows

Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available.

Free course

Environment: understanding atmospheric and ocean flows

4.3 Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and human activity

In recent decades, the understanding of the reality of climate change has moved from one of slow and gradual change over deep time to clear evidence that there have been naturally-occurring climate changes of several degrees Celsius and sea-level rises of half a metre within timescales of a decade or so (IPCC, 2013). In fact, research by Steffensen et al. (2008) on the Younger Dryas using ice core data revealed that central Greenland cooled by a staggering 2–4 °C in just 1–3 years, around ten times faster than the highest reconstructed rates of warming over the past two centuries (Box et al., 2009).

While the Younger Dryas and the 8.2 ka event were entirely natural, there is an additional human contribution to consider. But when exactly did the human contribution begin? Often the phrase ‘pre-industrial levels’ is used to mean ‘before significant anthropogenic changes started’, but it is not specific. Could humans have influenced the climate before the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century?

Another very significant greenhouse gas is methane (CH4), and 1 cubic metre of methane in the atmosphere can be over 25 times more effective at trapping heat than the same amount of CO2. Past atmospheric methane concentrations can also be directly measured from ice cores.

Over the last quarter of a million years, CH4 concentration and the variation of solar radiation reaching the Earth attributed to the Milankovitch cycle are positively correlated (Figure 24(a)). But this correlation dramatically breaks down in the most recent data of the Holocene.

The latest 5000 years of methane data show that the atmospheric concentration has risen dramatically out of synchrony with the solar radiation (Figure 24(b)). Three metres down in the EPICA ice core, dating to the 1820s, methane concentrations are as high as any period in the entire ice core record – approaching 800 ppb (parts per billion). Carbon dioxide has a similar break from the expected downward trend, although starting earlier, at about 8000 years ago.

If the ‘normal’ trend of methane and carbon dioxide was downwards, along with the Milankovitch cycle, then where have the extra gases come from?

Described image
Figure 24 (a) The atmospheric concentration of methane, and changes in solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface due to the Milankovitch cycles; (b) observed and expected atmospheric methane levels over the last 11 000 years up to 1937

Carbon dioxide and methane are by-products of civilisation. You often think of these by-products as beginning with the Industrial Revolution, but their story begins far earlier. In 2003, climate scientist William Ruddiman proposed that society had been altering the levels of these gases – and therefore influencing global climate – for many thousands of years. In his own words:

Human activities tied to farming – primarily agricultural deforestation and crop irrigation – must have added the extra CO2 and methane to the atmosphere.

(Ruddiman, 2005, p. 48)

Ruddiman suggests that these activities could have increased atmospheric concentrations by up to around 40 ppm for CO2 and 300 ppb for methane, increasing the expected natural levels by around 15% and 70% respectively (Ruddiman et al., 2016).

The amounts of CO2 and methane added to the atmosphere – and therefore the degree to which human activities changed the climate – during the agricultural era are still being debated, but now, of course, the human effect on these gases is clear.

As with CO2, since the Industrial Revolution the atmospheric concentration of methane has rapidly increased and currently is over 1800 ppb. Virtually all of that rise has been from anthropogenic sources, including major food production activities such as growing rice and cattle. Not only were humans possibly affected by climate change during the Holocene, but the impact by humans on the planet had already been started thousands of years before the Egyptian Pyramids were built. How then are these changes being seen today?

Activity 10 Recent climates

Timing: Allow about 10 minutes

How does the Earth’s climate over the last 10 000 years compare with that of previous times, and what does this mean for humans in the future?

Answer

Over the last 10 000 years, the Earth’s climate appears to have remained in a warm, stable state for longer than was normal in the preceding climate cycles. This has probably been important for humans in that they have been able to develop agriculture and other aspects of civilisation without the major disruption that would be caused by the major rapid cooling associated with ice ages. This means that when the Earth becomes warmer in future, humans may be less well adapted to the climate.

U116_6

Take your learning further

Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. The Open University has 50 years’ experience delivering flexible learning and 170,000 students are studying with us right now. Take a look at all Open University courses.

If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module, or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification. Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information.

Not ready for formal University study? Then browse over 1000 free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.

Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. With over 120 qualifications, we’ve got the right course for you.

Request an Open University prospectus371