Each participant contributed their personal priority outcomes by allocating five 'ticks' to an A3 list of the potential outcomes, during the break. The most numerically popular becomes the initial list of priority outcomes, which is presented back at the beginning of the second half. 

In Camden a participant made the case that local food production should be a priority. After a brief discussion in which they confirmed that this could be accomplished in various ways, and did not require the demolition of housing to create orchards, it was included. In Edinburgh, no outcomes were added, but the outcome of 'Space for development' was edited to add 'to meet community needs', rather than profit. (Subsequent analysis and feedback has resulted in the outcome being changed to 'Space for housing developments').