3 Using generalisation to find misconceptions
When you see an expression like 2(3 – 8), you might spot immediately that this could be rewritten as (2 × 3) – (2 × 8), because it is an example of the law of distributivity where a(b – c) = a × b – a × c.
Spotting such patterns and generalisations is helpful in mathematics because it makes it easier to solve problems. The downside is that sometimes you might think something is a pattern and so you generalise it, when actually it is a special case and will only be true in some circumstances. The next activity gives some examples of writing generalised algebra from numerical expressions.
Activity 4: Substituting the specific with the generalised form
Tell your students the following:
- Below are expressions and equations that are arithmetic examples of a generalised form that algebraic expressions and equations can take. Some of these are equations, not just expressions – make sure you know the difference.
- 2 (3 – 8)
- 12 + (13 + 81) = (12 + 13) + 81
- 2 + 2 = 2 × 2
- (–7) = 7
- 42 + 0 = 42
- 23 × 1 = 23
- 5 per cent of 120
- (12 + 51)/(12 × 51)
- 2 + 3 = 3 + 2
- Write down general algebraic expressions or equations for these. There is more than one solution for some of them, so be inventive!
- Will these always hold true? Can you say that they will be valid for any number?
You may also want to have a look at the key resource ‘Monitoring and giving feedback [Tip: hold Ctrl and click a link to open it in a new tab. (Hide tip)] ’.
Case Study 3: Mrs Agarwal reflects on using Activity 4
Mohit spotted straight away that the first expression, 2 (3 – 8), was an example of the distributive property over subtraction, and according to him it would hold for any value of number. He gave the general form as a(b – c) = a × b – a × c.
The example of 2 + 2 = 2 × 2 led to interesting discussions and made some misconceptions come to the fore about indices and what ‘to the power of’ means when Rima said that ‘= 22’ could be added to that equation. Questions 6 and 7 made the students think about identities and some were surprised that these were not the same for all operations – they actually knew this when working with arithmetic examples, but seemed to have forgotten when using a generalised form!
Although I was happy to try out this task, I had not expected that it would offer me so many insights into students’ misconceptions. I am still thinking about why this activity lets this happen. Was it the discussion, or the ‘simple’ examples? Why does it not happen so much when doing exercises from textbooks? When I am thinking about ways that I assess my students in class, I must remember that using tasks that ask the students to apply what they know in an unusual but not necessarily difficult context lets me evaluate what they know very clearly.
![]() Pause for thought
|
2 Using substitution to think about possibilities